INVESTIGATION ON THE EFFECTS OF THE GENOTYPE X ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION IN SOME NEW BULGARIAN COMMON WINTER WHEAT CULTIVARS

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Sep 1, 2018
Keywords:
Triticum aestivum L , ecological plasticity and stability , AMMI models.

Main Article Content

Emil Penchev
Dobrudzha Agricultural Institute – General Toshevo, Bulgaria
Tatiana Petrova
Dobrudzha Agricultural Institute – General Toshevo, Bulgaria

Abstract

Fifteen new Bulgarian common winter wheat cultivars were investigated for ecological plasticity and stability in four replicates of a randomized experiment during 2014 – 2016. The applied two-factor dispersion analysis proved the different genetic potential of the group of cultivars according to the investigated indices to the highest degree of statistical significance, as well as the effect of the climatic conditions. The genotype x ecological conditions interaction was significant for all indices, which was a necessary prerequisite to apply AMMI models for evaluation of the cultivars’ ecological plasticity and stability according to the investigated indices. The use of the АММI models allowed the evaluation of the ecological plasticity on the basis of the statistical parameters ASV, and of the ecological stability on the basis of the reliability index I. According to the index yield, cultivar Laska was with the highest plasticity and stability, ranking first among all cultivars. Cultivars Laska, Progress, Enola, Bezostaya 1, Kristi and Yantur demonstrated high ecological plasticity and stability according to the complex of all investigated traits.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol 72 No 2 (2018): Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, JAFES
Section
Articles

References

1. Abamu, J., E. Akinsola & K.Aliuri. Applying the AMMI models to understand genotype – by – environment (GxE) interactions in rice reaction to blast disease in Africa. Journal of Pest Management, pp 239-245, 2007.
2. Cornelius, L., J. Crossa. Prediction assessment of shrinkage estimators of multiplicative model for multi – environment cultivar trials. Crop Science, v.39, pp 998-1009, 1999.
3. Dias, S., W. Krzanowski. Model selection and cross validation in additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) models. Crop Science, v 43, pp 865-873, 2003.
4. Nachit, M., G. Nachit, H.Ketata, G. Gauch & R. Zobel. Use of AMMI and linear regression models to analyze genotype x environment interaction in durum wheat. TAG v.83, N.5, pp 597-601, 2002.
5. Lee, Eun-Joo. Statistical Analysis Software for Multiplicative Interaction Models. Doctoral Dissertation. Kansas State University, 2004.
6. Miliken, A., E. Johnson. Analysis of Messy Data. Volume 2. Nonreplicated Experiments (2nd Edition), New York. Chapman & Hall, 1989.
7. Penchev E., I.Stoeva.Estimation the ecological plasticity and stability of a group winter wheat varieties. Field Crop Studies. Vol. , pp 30-33 . 2004.
8. Penchev E., M.Atanasova,I.Stoeva. Еvaluation the ecological plasticity and stability of quality indices and productivity of winter wheat varieties by models of Shukla , Eberhart & Russel . International Scientific Conference , Agrar University Plovdiv . pp 61-65 . 2005.
9. Rane J. at all. Performance of Yield and Stability of Advanced Wheat Genotypes under Heat Stress Environments of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Crop Science. Vol. 47 No. 4, p. 1561-1573, 2006.
10. Tsenov,N. , at all . Problems, achievements and perspectivies of the breeding of winter wheat by productivity . Field Crops - fcs.dai-gt.org ,2009.