Time and Space in the Novel "Domestic Snake" by Arian Leka

Main Article Content

Florentina Fetahi

Abstract

“I do not define time, space, place and motion, as being well known to all.”
- Isaac Newton in Scholium to the Principia, 1687



As a narrative structure, as a discourse that neatly animates in itself a spectrum of feelings, dreams, hopes, faith, revolt, from which it weaves a metaphor for the existence of a parallel world, the approach to a world so close and far away at the same time, is one of the most special works in contemporary Albanian and, in general, Balkan literature.
The two parallel streams in the portraying of a world that is shown and that which is implied, which is intended, to connect a parable of known and unknown codes that communicate with each other. Arian Leka invents a different world, transformed, disintegrated, maybe even in a way deformed to specify the ironic and grotesque expressiveness, to show the reality as loudly as possible.Paradoxicality as the internal substance of the metaphor, as ironic and grotesque expressiveness, in the novel The House Snake as the first reflection, the transition to the apostrophe of the human being appears as the first appearance, therefore in this narrative it is the blindness of love that gives meaning to this world, the reason for existence, even in the world of the blind men.
This is a story about a confrontation with oneself, with history, with the fate of isolation in space and time, with the intrusive and isolationist ideology. Here, the sea shows the author the way to the inevitable personal and collective catharsis, the way to freedom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Трудови од втор и од трет циклус студии

References

Библиографија на кирилица:

Бојаџиевска, Маја (2002), Мит, идентитет и книжевност, Скопје: Сигмапрес.
Лека, А. ( 2016) Домашна змија. (прев. од алб. јазик Мирјана Илиева Јашари). Готен: Скопје.
Лукач, Ѓ. (1978) Теорија на романот. Македонска книга: Скопје.
Србиновска, С. (2003) Низ призмата на другиот, Сигмапрес, Скопје.
Србиновска, С. (2006) Субјект, книжевност, култура, Сигмапрес, Скопје.
Ќулавкова, К. (2003) Teорија на интертекстуалноста. Култура, Скопје.
Солар, М. (1978) Теорија на книжевноста (Teoria e letërsisë). Рилиндја, Приштина.

Библиографија на латиница:
Carr, D. (1991) Time, narrative, and history. Indiana University Press, Bloomington/Indianapolis.
Culler, J. (1997) Literary theory – A very short introduction, O. U. P. I., New York.
Дадо, Ф. (2007) Каков е текот на книжевноста во ‘90-тите? (Si rrjedh letërsia e viteve ’90?), во Mehr Licht, бр.30, Идеарт, Tирана.
Hačion, L. (1996) Poetika postmodernizma, (прев. V. Glozden, L. Stanković). Svetovi, Novi Sad.
Hegel, G. V. F. (1986) Estetika III, (прев. Nikola Popović). Beograd: Beogradski Izdavačko-Grafički Zavod. Хедајат, С. (1977) Слепиот був (Bufi i verbër), (прев. на алб. јазик Муса Рамадани). Приштина: Рилиндја.
Jauss, H. R. (1978) Estetika recepcije: izbor studija. Beograd: Nolit.
Крифца-Беќири, М. (2013) во Studime letrare (прев. Книжевни студии). Цит: на Јулија Кристева, Moči užasa. Ватра, Скопје,, стр. 53.
Lloyd. G. (1993) Being in time: Selves and narrators in philosophy and literature. Routledge, UK,.
Nelson, K. E. (1969) The Concept of Time in the Novels of Virginia Woolf. (Thesis). Texas: Graduate Faculty of Texas Technological College.