THE UNKNOWABILITY AND THE INEFFABILITY OF GOD ACCORDING TO JOHN SCOTT (ERIUGENA)

Abstract

The paper explores the negative theology employed in John (Scott) Eriugena’s
work “On the division of nature” as a core structure in his ontological system.
Apophatic stances are crucial in Eriugena’s exposition of the position and role of
God, and thus in the intricate functioning of the four divisions of nature and his
concept of the five modes of interpretation of being. The basic categories in his system
of nature are shown, along with the most poignant claims of the ineffability and
unknowability of God, in order to then analyse his framework of kataphatic and apophatic
theologies in approaching the inaccessible, super-essential, incomprehensible
nature of the divinity. Eriugena’s opinions on the values and workings of the two
branches of theology place them not in conflict or disagreement with one another,
but as complementary and in constant harmony. A major part of the paper deals
with Eriugena’s preference for the negations of the apophatic theology when talking
about God, paired with an obvious awareness that the merits of the kataphatic theology
are also substantial in expressing a trace of God as a manifestation in the created
world; as well as with his dialectical manoeuvre of stressing the significance of
the more-than formulateons for God’s super-essentiality. Therefore, Eriugena’s ideas
on the formulae that are affirmative in form, but negative in meaning will be overviewed,
in order to show his take on the advantages of the synthesis of the kataphatic
and the apophatic theologies, in the form of a “hyperphatic” theology expressing God
as non-expressible (because more-than-expressible).