DIFFERING IN AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY CHARACTERS IN SOME BACKCROSS–DERIVED LINES IN BREAD WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.) GENOTYPES
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Апстракт
The backcrossing method remains an efficient tool for transferring genes into established crop varieties. In this study; we were focused on evaluating the selected some backcross lines for yield, grain-quality traits and some agronomic traits under field condition. The experiment was conducted using 15 genotypes in randomized completely blocks design with four replications in Trakya ARI experimental field, during 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 growing years. Grain yield, days of heading and maturing, plant height and some quality parameters and relationship among these parameters were investigated. According to results, there was statistically difference among genotypes in terms of yield and other investigated characters, except for 1000-kernel weight, test weight. Grain yields decreased in Pehlivan, Aldane, Tekirdağ and Dropia backcross lines. It was determined that TKW increased in the backcross derived lines of the Gelibolu, Dropia and Prostor, gluten value increased in Pehlivan and Tekirdağ cultivars. Backcross line for gluten index of the Pehlivan, Aldane, Gelibolu, Prostor and Dropia cultivars highly increased compared with other components. Sedimentation values of the backcross lines of cultivars decreased in Prostor and increased in Pehlivan, Gelibolu and Dropia. The strongly negative correlations were measured between grain yield and days of maturing (r=-0.689**), plant height (r=-0.655**), and lodging resistant (r=-0.743**). Also, grain yield was negatively correlated with protein ratio (r=-0.608*), gluten value (r=-0.541*), and days of heading (r=-0.607*). The negative correlations were found between grain yield and 1000-kernel weight, test weight, hardness, sedimentation, and winter-kill, as well. The strong positive correlations were measured between protein ratio and gluten, hardness, sedimentation, days of heading and maturing, plant height, and lodging resistant. Grain hardness in genotypes increased with the extension of maturation period of the genotypes. Plant height in genotypes strongly correlated with grain yield, protein ratio, gluten value, gluten index, days of heading and maturing.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Референци
3. Anonymous, (1990). AACC Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemist, USA.
4. Anonymous, (2002). International Association for Cereal Sci. and Technology. (ICC Standart No: 110, Standart No: 105, Standart No: 106, Standart No: 155, Standart No: 116, Standart No: 115).
5. Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Ed. John Willey and Sons, Inc. New York. 641.
6. Samaan J, El-Khayat, G.H, Manthey, F, Fuller, M, Brennan, C.S. (2006). Durum wheat quality: II The relationship of kernel physicochemical composition to semolina quality and end product utilisation. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 41, 47–55.
7. Johansson, E, Svensson, G. (1998). Variation in bread making quality: Effect of weather parameters on protein concentration and quality in some Swedish wheat cultivars grown during the period 1975–1996. J. Sci. Food Agric., 78, 109–118.
8. Kalaycı, M., (2005). Örneklerle Jump Kullanımı ve Tarımsal Araştırma için Varyans Analiz Modelleri. Anadolu Tarımsal Araştırma Enst. Müd. Yayınları, Yayın No: 21, Eskişehir.
9. Köksel H, Sivri D, Özboy O, Başman A. ve Karacan H.D. (2000). Hububat Laboratuarı El Kitabı. Hacettepe Üni. Müh. Fak. Yay. No: 47, Ankara. (Handbook of the Cereal Laboratory. Hacettepe Uni. Fac. of Eng. No: 47, Ankara, Turkey).
10. Lerner, S.E., Seghezzo, M.L., Molfese, E.R., Ponzio, N.R., Cogliatti, M. & Rogers, W.J. (2006). N- and S- fertilisers effects on grain composition, industrial quality and end-use in durum wheat. Journal of Cereal Science, 44, 2–11.
11. Öztürk İ, Korkut K.Z. (2015). Effect of Drought Consist of Different Plant Growth on Some Physiological Traits in Bread Wheat (Triticun aestivum L.) Genotypes. 2. International Plant Breeding Congress (2. IPBC), 1-5 Nov., 2015. Antalya, Turkey.
12. Öztürk İ, Çiftçigil TH, Kahraman T, Avcı R, Seidi M, Girgin VÇ, Tülek A, Tuna B, Akın K. (2017). Relationship Among Biotic Stress Factors And Agronomic Characters In Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes under Various Environmental Conditions. Agriculture and Food. Vol: 5, p: 551-561.
13. Peterson C.J., Graybosch R.A., Shelton D.R., and Baenziger P.S. (1998). Baking quality of hard red winter wheat: Response of cultivars to environments in the Great Plains. Euphytica 100 (1-3): 157-162.
14. Sissons, M.J., Egan, N.E. & Gianibelli, M.C. (2005). New insights into the role of gluten on durum pasta quality using reconstitution method. Cereal Chemistry, 82, 601–608.
15. Viana, J.M.S., and Cruz, C.D., (200). Analysis of stability and adaptability through different models of linear regression. Cienc Agrotec Lavras, 26: 455-462.
16. Yan, W., and Hunt, L.A., (2001). Interpretation of genotype x environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Sci., 41: 19-25.
17. Yong Z, Zhonghu H, Aimin Z, Van Ginkel M. (2004). Effect of environment and genotype on bread-making quality of spring-sown spring wheat cultivars in China. Euphytica. March 2004, Volume 139, Issue 1, pp 75–83.
18. Zadoks J, Chang T, and Konzak C. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed research 14:415-421.