EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID SEED TREATMENT ON YIELD AND SOME YIELD CHARACTERISTIC OF CORN PLANT (Zea mays L. indentata)
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Апстракт
This study was aimed to determination of seed treated humic acid effects to yield and some yield characteristics of corn plant (Zea mays L. indentata) as grown second crop conditions. Study was set up according to randomized complete blocks experimental design with 3 replicates under Harran Plain conditions in 2012, Sanliurfa, Turkey. Motril hybrid corn variety was used as a plant material. Humic acid seed treatments were 0 (control), %2.5, %5, %7.5, %10, and %12 humic acid concentrations. Humic acid concentrations were applied to corn seed before sowing. Some yield and yield characteristic of corn plant such as tassel flowering duration, plant height, leaf number per plant, grain weight of ear, thousand kernel weights and grain yield were evaluated in the study. As a result of research; statistical significant differences were seen among humic acid seed treatments at tassel flowering duration and leaf number per plant (P≤0.05). Also, humic acid seed treatments were significant at grain weight of ear, thousand kernel weights and grain yield (P≤0.01). Tassel flowering duration decreased with humic acid seed treatment whereas leaf number per plant, grain weight of ear, thousand kernel weights and grain yield values increased with humic acid seed treatment. The highest values were found in % 7.5 humic acid seed treatment.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Референци
2. Anonymous, 2017a, http://www.fao.org. 23.07.2017
3. Anonymous, 2017b http://www.tuik.gov.tr/VeriBilgi.do?alt_id=45. 23.07.2017
4. Bohme, M., Hoang, L.T. and Vorverk, R. (2001). Effect of different substrates and mineral as well as organic nutrition on the growth of cucumber in closed substrate systems. Acta Horticulturae, 548: 165-172.
5. Bozoglu, H., Pesken, E. and Gulumser, A. (2004). Sira araligi ve potasyum humat uygulamasının bezelyenin verim ve bazı özelliklerine etkisi. A.U. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi, 10 (1): 53-58.
6. Casenave de Sanfillipo, E., Arguello, J.A., Abdala G. and Orioli, G.A. (1990). Content of auxin– inhibitor and gibberellin like substances in humic acids. Biol. Pl., 32: 346-351.
7. Cimrin, K.M., Karaca, S. and Bozkurt, M.A. (2001). Misir bitkisinin gelisimi ve beslenmesi uzerine humik asit ve NPK uygulamalarinin etkisi. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7 (2): 95-100.
8. Chen Y, Aviad T (1990). Effects of humic substances on plant growth. In MacCarthy, P., Clapp, C. E., Malcolm, R.L. and Bloom, P.R. (eds), Humic Substances in Soil and Crop Science: Selected Readings, Madison, WI: SSSA and ASA, 161– 186.
9. David, P.P., Nelson, P.V. and Sanders, D.C. (1994). A humic acid improves growth of tomato seedling in solution culture. J. Pl. Nutr., 17: 173–84.
10. Day, S., Kolsarici, O. and Kaya, M. (2011). Humik asit uygulamalari zamani ve dozlarinin ayciceginde (Helianthus annuus) verim, verim ogeleri ve yag oranina etkisi. Akdeniz Universitesi Ziraat Fakultesi Dergisi, 24 (1): 33-37.
11. Dogan, E. (2002). Sera kosullarinda humik asit katkili kati ortam kulturuyle yetistirilen domatesin gelisim, verim ve meyve ozelliklerinin belirlenmesi. A.U. Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu Bahce Bitkileri Anabilim Dali Yuksek Lisans Tezi. 2002. Ankara.
12. Gok, M., Anlarsal, A.E., Ulger, A.C., Yucel, C. and Onac, I. (1995). Bazi baklagil yesil gubre bitkilerinde N2 fiksasyonu ve biyomas verimi. Ilhan Akalan Toprak ve Cevre Sempozyumu, January 1-2, 1995, Ankara, Turkey, p: 207-216.
13. Gursoy, M., Nofouzi, F. and Basalma, D. (2016). Effects humic acid application at different stages of growth on yield and yield components of winter rapeseed crops. Journal of field Crops Central Research Institute, 25 (2): 131-136.
14. Hopkins, B., and Stark, J. (2003). Humic acid effects on potato response to phosphorus. Idaho Potato Conference, January 22-23, 2003, Idaho, USA, p:87-92.
15. Kacar, B. and Katkat, V. (2011). Bitki Besleme. Nobel Yayinevi, p: 678, Ankara, Turkey.
16. Karakaya, Z. and Paksoy, M. (2008). Yaz sezonunda yetistirilen brokkoli’de (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) bazı organik maddelerin bitki gelisimi, verim ve kaliteye etkileri. Selçuk Univ. Ziraat Fak. Dergisi, 22 (44): 1-6.
17. Kaya, M., Ata, M., Khawar, KM,, Çitfçi, CY. and Ozcan S. (2005). Effect of pre-sowing seed treatment with zinc and foliar spray of humic acids on yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 6: 875-878.
18. Lee, Y.S. and Bartlett, R.J. (1976). Stimulation of plant growth by humic substances. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 40: 876-9.
19. Oren, Y. and Basal, H. (2005). Humik asit ve cinko (Zn) uygulamalarinin pamukta (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) verim, verim komponentleri ve lif kalite ozelliklerine etkisi. ADU Ziraat Fakultesi Dergisi, 3 (2): 77-83.
20. Padem, H. (1998). Humik asit katkili yaprak gubresi uygulamasinin hiyar’da (Cucumis sativus L.) fide kalitesi ve besin elementi icerigine etkisi. S.D.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu Dergisi, 3 (1): 27-41.
21. Padem H, Ocal A (1998). Effect of humic acid added foliar fertilizer on some nutrient content of eggplant and pepper seedlings. XXV th International Horticulture Congress, Benelux, Brussels, 17 August 1998, Abstract Book, 180 pp.
22. Piccolo, A., G. Pietramellara and Mbagwu, J.S.C. (1997). Reduction in soil loss from erosion– susceptible soils amended with humic substances from oxidized coal. Soil Technology, 10: 23545.
23. Rauthan BS, Schnitzer M (1981). Effects of a soil fulvic acid on the growth and nutrient content of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants. Plant and Soil 63: 491-495.
24. Selcuk, R. and Tufenkci, S. (2009). Artan dozlarda cinko ve humik asit uygulamalarinin misirin verim ve besin icerigine etkisi. Yuzuncu Yıl Univ. Fen Bil. Enst. Yuksek Lisans Tezi, pp:54, Van. 25. Sharif, M., R.A. Khattak and Sarir, M.S. (2002). Wheat and nutrients accumulation as affected by humic acid and chemical fertilizers. Sarhad J. Agric., 18: 323–329.