STUDIES ON SOME QUALITY COMPONENTS IN A LANDRACE COLLECTION OF CLIMBING BEANS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS VAR. COMMUNIS)
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Апстракт
The study aimed at evaluating a landraces collection of climbing beans regarding some characters that contribute to quality of grains or green pods. The biological material was formed of 56 landraces and 2 varieties of climbing beans from which the grains or green pods can be used in food. The landraces were collected from western and southwestern Romania. The experimentation was performed over three years in a collection-type experience, arranged in three repetitions. As elements of quality we determined: the percentage of husks from beans, boiling coefficient, the percentage of bean total protein, 1000 grain weight, the percentage of sugar in green pods. The experimental data were processed by analysis of variance and applying the t-test for determination of differences from the variety ‘Aurie de Bacau’ used as a control. The collection includes precious populations for all studied characters, but their number is reduced. For the percentage of grain husks and the protein content of grain, the most populations are below the control variety. For sugar percentage in green pod and the coefficient of boiling, the landraces are similar to control variety. In the collection, there are populations that can be processed by selection or can be used as parents in hybridization programs.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Референци
2. Andrade Silva Camila, de Fatima Barbosa Abreu Angela, Patto Ramalho M.A., Duarte Correa Angelita, Silva Maia L.G. (2010) Genetic variability for protein and minerals content in common bean lines (Phaseolus vulgaris L) Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative, 53: 144145.
3. Balcha Alemayehu (2010) Genetic variation for grain yield and water absorption in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), African Journal of Food Science and Technology, 1(6): 128-131.
4. Ciulca S. (2006) Metodologii de experimentare în agricultură şi biologie. Ed. Agropirnt, Timişoara.
5. Correa Mariana Marques, Jaeger de Carvalho M Lucia., Nutti Marilia Regini, Viana de Carvalho J.,L., Hohn Neto A.R., Gomes Ribeiro M. Ediane (2010) Water Absorption, Hard Shell and Cooking Time of Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), African J.Food Sci.Tech., 1(1): 13-2.
6. Dalfollo Ribeiro Nerinéia, de Abreu Rodrigues Josana, Prigol Marina, Wayne Nogueira Cristina, Storck L., Muller Gruhn E. (2014) Evaluation of special grains bean lines for grain yield, cooking time and mineral concentrations. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol.,14 (1),15-22.
7. Escribano M.R. , Santalla M. , de Ron A.M. (1997) Genetic diversity in pod and seed quality traits of common bean populations from northwestern Spain, Euphytica, 93 (1): 71–81.
8. Gouveia S. S. Carla, Freitas G., de Brito H.J., Slaski J.J., Pinheiro de Carvalho M.A.A., ( 2014) Nutritional and Mineral Variability in 52 Accessions of Common Bean Varieties (Phaseolus vulgarisL.) from Madeira Island, Agricultural Sciences, 5: 317-329.
9. Harunor Rashid A.S.M., Hossain M.M. (2014), Yield and Quality of Green Pod Production of Bush Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) As Influenced by Harvesting Time, American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 14 (11): 1221-1227.
10. Kigel J. (1999) Culinary and Nutritional Quality of Phaseolus vulgaris Seeds as Affected by Environmental Factors. Biotechnology,Agronomy,Society and Environment, 3: 205-209.
11. Lioi Lucia, Nuzz A., Campion B., Piergiovanni Angela Rosa (2012) Assessment of genetic variation in common bean( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Nebrodi mountains (Sicily, Italy), Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol., 59:455–464.
12. Nienhuis J., Kisha T., Bethke P. (2016) Understanding and improving flavor in snap beans: Screening the USDA Phaseolus core collection for pod sugar and flavor compounds. Bean Improvement Cooperative Annual Report. 59:31-32.
13. Noubissie J.B.T., Bell J.M., Yadji H.T. (2012) Studies on variability and gene effects of seed protein contents in Cameroonian bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. J. Agric. Soc. Sci., 8: 17–23.
14. Pujola M., Farreras A., Casanas F. (2007) Protein and Starch Content of Raw, Soaked and Cooked Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Chemistry, 102: 1034-1041.
15. Saba I., Sofi P.A., Zeerak N.A., Bhat M.A., Mir R.R. (2016) Characterisation of a core set of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm for seed quality traits, Sabrao Journal of Breeding and Genetics 48(3): 359-376.
16. Saha Supradip, Singh Gyanendra, Mahajan Vinay, Gupta H.S. (2009) Variability of Nutritional and Cooking Quality in Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) as a Function of Genotype. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 64(2):174-80.
17. Silveira P.M., Mesquita A.M., Gonzaga A.C.O., Bernardes T.G., da Cunha P.C.R (2016) Variability of mass and content of mineral elements in grains of the common bean cultivar Pérola , Jaboticabal, 44 (3),: 446–450.
18. Singh S.P., (2001) Broadening the Genetic Base of Common Bean Cultivars: A Review. Crop Science, 41: 1659-1675.
19. Wani I.A., Sogi D.S., Wani A.A, Singh Gill B.(2017)- Physical and cooking characteristics of some Indian kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars, Journal of the Saudi Soc.Agr.Sci., 16 (1): 7– 15.