ORANGE PEEL: (ANTI-)DIDACTIC POLITICAL DRAMA AND ITS IDEOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS
Keywords:
political theatre, theatre audience, Maja Pelević, Orange Peel, Kokan Mladenović, didacticism, feminism, class distinction, reception, cultural studiesAbstract
This paper examines the figure of the theatre audience in
contemporary Serbian political drama and theatre, proceeding from the
assumption that the audience constitutes a key site for the articulation of
power, knowledge and ideology. The analysis focuses on Maja Pelević’s
play Orange Peel (2006), which is interpreted within the broader
framework of public discourse on political theatre, including the positions
articulated by Kokan Mladenović. Drawing on insights from cultural
studies, reception theory, Bourdieu’s concept of class distinction, as well
as contemporary feminist and intersectional approaches, the paper
explores the ways in which the audience is constructed as “ignorant”,
“passive”, or “equal”, and how implicit hierarchies are reproduced within
these constructions.
Particular attention is devoted to the tension between didacticism and the
emancipatory aspirations of political theatre, as well as to the question of
who is granted the right to speak within theatrical discourse. The analysis
demonstrates that, despite efforts toward democratization and dialogue,
contemporary models of political theatre often retain subtle forms of
didacticism and exclusion, both at the level of representation and
reception. In this sense, the paper points to the necessity of a more radical
re-examination of internal structures of power within theatre, in order to
enable a genuinely participatory and egalitarian understanding of the
relationship between stage and audience.
Downloads
References
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Harvard University Press.
Burdije, Pjer. (2008). „Klasni ukusi i životni stilovi“ [“Class Tastes and Lift-Styles ”]. Studije kulture [Cultural Studies]. Ur. Jelena Đorđević i dr. Beograd: Službeni glasnik. 155–177. (In Serbian.)
Delač, Nataša. (2016). Ženska drama i muško društvo. Status žene u društvu i umetnosti na primeru drama Milene Marković, Maje Pelević i Milene Bogavac [Female drama and male society. Female status in society and art in plays written by Milena Marković, Maja Pelević, and Milena Bogavac]. Beograd: Fakultet dramskih umetnosti. (In Serbian.)
Hall, Stuart. (2019). “Notes on Deconstructing ’the Popular’”, Essential Essays: Volume 1. Edited by David Morley. Duke University Press. 357–362.
hooks, bell. (2000). Feminism Is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. South End Press.
Hoskin, Rhea Ashley. (2017). “Femme Theory: Refocusing the Intersectional Lens”. Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice, vol. 38, no. 1, June. pp. 95–109. https://doi.org/10.7202/1119647arCopiedAn%20error%20has%20o. Accessed 17 Feb. 2026.
Jansen, Stef. (2005). “Who’s Afraid of White Socks? Towards a Critical Understanding of Post-Yugoslav Urban Self-Perceptions”. Ethnologia Balkanica, vol. 9, pp. 151–167.
Mladenović, Kokan. (2025). „Ni u najglupljem vicu nismo slobodarski narod“ [“Na engleskom naslov teksta”]. Danas, dnevni list. 19 Dec., www.danas.rs/kultura/intervju-kokan-mladenovic/. Accessed 20 Feb. 2026. (In Serbian.)
Mladenović, Kokan. (2025). „Zašto smo mi magarci?“ [We are not a libertarian nation, even in the funniest joke.]. 021.Rs, 22 Dec., www.021.rs/info/misljenja-i-intervjui/430248/intervju-kokan-mladenovic-zasto-smo-mi-magarci. Accessed 20 Feb. 2026. (In Serbian.)
Pelević, Maja. (2019). „Pomorandžina kora“ [“Orange Peel”]. Scribd. PDF, uploaded by Stefan Cfc Pavlović, Scribd, 2026, www.scribd.com/document/453227360/POMORANDZINA-KORA-maja-pelevi%C4%87. Accessed 20 Feb. 2026. (In Serbian.)
Pelević, Maja. (2020). „Publika se poziva na dijalog među jednakima“ [“The audience is being invited into a conversation with the equals”]. Hoću u pozorište [I Want To Go To Theatre]. hocupozoriste.rs/intervjui/maja-pelevic-publika-se-poziva-na-dijalog-medu-jednakima. Accessed 20 Feb. 2026. (In Serbian.)
Pelević, Maja. (2020). „Sistem možemo da urušimo radeći na opštem dobru, a ne na spasavanju sopstvenog dupeta“ [We can only smash the system by aiming for the greater good instead of saving our own ass“”]. 021, 6 Oct., www.021.rs/info/misljenja-i-intervjui/255001/intervju-maja-pelevic-sistem-mozemo-da-urusimo-radeci-na-opstem-dobru-a-ne-na-spasavanju-sopstvenog-dupeta. Accessed 22 Feb. 2026. (In Serbian.)
Rancière, Jacques. (2009). The Emancipated Spectator. Verso.
Simić, Marina. (2014). Kosmopolitska čežnja: etnografija srpskog postsocijalizma [Cosmopolitan Longing: Ethnography of Serbian Postsocialism]. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka. (In Serbian.)
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. (1994). “Can the Subaltern Speak?”. Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader. Edited by Laura Chrisman and Patrick Williams. Columbia University Press. 67–111.
Vilijams, Rejmond. (2008). „Analiza kulture“ [“The Analysis of Culture”]. Studije kulture [Cultural Studies]. Ur. Jelena Đorđević i dr. Beograd: Službeni glasnik. 124–133. (In Serbian.)
Zivkovic, Marko. (2007). “’Mile vs Transition’ – a Perfect Informant in the Slushy Swamp of Serbian Politics?”. Social Identities, vol. 13, no. 5, Sept. pp. 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630701580266. Accessed 21 Feb. 2026.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vida Davidović

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Philological studies © 2019. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License