THE IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ACTIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES IN TURKISH CLASSROOMS: A STUDY IN NORTH MACEDONIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37834/JCP2691175kKeywords:
Active learning, application, North Macedonia, Turkish classesAbstract
This study aims to examine the level of implementation of active learning strategies in Turkish classes in North Macedonia. The study used the relational screening method, one of the quantitative research models. The study‘s data were collected from teachers working in Turkish classes in North Macedonia. In this context, 127 teachers who carried out educational activities in the 2024-2025 academic year constitute the study group. The study group was formed using the convenience sampling method, a non-random sampling method. In the study‘s quantitative data collection, the “Scale of the implementation of active learning activities in Turkish classes in North Macedonia” developed as a seven-point Likert was used. Parametric statistical techniques were used in the analysis of quantitative data. As a result of the analyses made on the quantitative data of the study, it was determined that teachers use active learning techniques at a high level in their lessons. However, it was determined that active learning applications were used less in the conclusion sections of the course. No significant difference was found between the teachers’ gender, age, professional seniority, branch, education level, their status of receiving active learning training, on the one hand, and their level of implementation of active learning strategies, on the other. However, it is recommended that awareness and in-service training programs be developed to make teachers’ active learning practices more effective. It is considered important to prepare guide materials that will increase the integration of active learning, especially in the conclusion sections of the course.
References
Acıkgoz, K. U. (2009). Aktif öğrenme (Active Learning) (11th ed.). Biliş Publishing.
Bonwell, C. C. and Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the college classroom. Washington DC: School of Education and Human Development.
Buyukozturk, S. (2013). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (Handbook for anaysis in social sciences). Pegem Akademi Publishing.
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Demirel, O. (2009). Kuramdan uygulamaya eğitimde program geliştirme (Program development in education from theory to application) (12. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Akademi
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38 (3), 181-199.
Desimone, L. M. and Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society & Education, 7 (3), 252–263.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., and Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (23), 8410–8415.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C. and Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74 (1), 59–109.
Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J. and Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Huggett, K. N. and Jeffries, W. B. (2021). Overview of active learning research and rationale for active learning. In How-to guide for active learning (pp. 1–7). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Ibrahim, T. and Karaberzat, M. (2022). Kuzey Makedonya’da Türkçe Eğitimin Durumu ve Çözüm Önerileri. Gostivar.
Kristik, E. (2020). Organization of the learning process for students in primary education (Unpublished master thesis). Ss. Cyrill and Methodius University, Faculty of Philosophy.
Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159–167.
Nguyen, K. A., Borrego, M., Finelli, C. J., DeMonbrun, M., Crockett, C., Tharayil, S., Shekhar, P., Waters, C., and Rosenberg, R. (2021). Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 9.
Oktar, İ. ve Bulduk, S. (1999). “Evaluation of the behaviors of teachers working in secondary education institutions”. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 142, 66–69.
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © 2014 Blaže Koneski Faculty of Philology, Skopje
Journal of Contemporary Philology (JCP)
Современа филологија
