EVALUATION OF BREAD WHEAT GENOTYPES WITH DIFFERENT PHENOLOGICAL CHARACTERS IN TERMS OF RESISTANCE TO SUNN PEST DAMAGE

Main Article Content

Akyürek, S.
Başer, İ.

Abstract

The research was conducted with 23 different varieties in field condition and closed area in 2010 and 2011. Twenty three bread wheat varieties were grown in open fields and closed areas in Faculty of Agriculture, University of Namik Kemal experimental area. The nifm number, sunn pest damage ratio, black point, protein ratio, moisture ratio, sedimentation rate, retarded sedimentation rate, gluten rate and index in the bread wheat varieties were examined. The highest sunn pest damage rate in the samples grown in field condition was found from Tekirdağ sample with 3,08 % and followed by Alga, Renan, Sadova, Geya and Krasnodarskaya-99 samples. The lowest damage rate was obtained from Enola and Dropia with 1,60 %; Krasunia with 1,63 %. In bread wheat samples grown in closed areas, the sunn pest damage rate increased considerably and measured between 4,93-12,75%. According to the average of two seasons, the highest sunn pest damage rate was obtained respectively from Geya, Tekirdağ, Renan and Sadova samples. The lowest damage rates were obtained from Gelibolu, KateA-1, Krasunia and Dropia samples. When the quality features were analysed, gluten, gluten index, zeleny sedimentation and retarded sedimentation values reduced substantially in comparison with values obtained outdoors. Retarded sedimentation values in all samples were at a quite low level that making the crop useless.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Boyacıoğlu, M.H., 1994. Un ve ekmeğin depolanması ve paketlenmesi. Un Mamülleri Dünyası., 3: 24.
2. Erbaş M (2005). Süne, Eurygaster spp., (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) Böceklerinin Buğdaylara Verdikleri Tek. Zararlar ve Zararların Azaltılma Çalışmaları. Unlu Mam. Tek., 14(69):62-64, 66-68, 70-82.
3. Finney, K.F., B.L. Jones and M.D., Snogren, 1978. Functional (Breadmaking) properties of wheat protein fractions obtained by ultracentrifugation. Cereal Chem., 59: 449–54
4. Gözüaçık C, Yiğit A (2011). Süne, Eurygaster integriceps Put. Zararının Bazı Buğday Çeşitlerinde Kalite Özelliklerine Etkileri. Türkiye IV. Bitki Koruma Kongresi 28‐30 Haziran 2011, Kahramanmaraş.
5. Hariri G, Williams PC, El-Harameın FJ (2000). Influence of Pentatomid Insects on the Physical Dough Properties and Two-Layered Flat Bread Baking Quality of Syrian Wheat. Journal of Cereal Science, 31:111-118.
6. Kınacı E, Kınacı G (2004). Quality and yield losses due to sunn pest (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) in different wheat types in Turkey, Fields Crops Research 89, 187-195.
7. Koçak E. ve Babaroğlu N. (2005). Orta Anadolu bölgesi kışlaklarındaki Eurygaster (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae) türleri. 29 (4): 301-307.
8. Köksel H, Sivri D (2002). Süne-Kımıl Enzimlerinin Çeşitli Özellikleri ve Gluten Proteinleri Üzerine Etkileri. Hububat 2002 Hububat Ürünleri Tekn. Kong. ve Sergisi Bildiri Kitabı, s.49-56.
9. Köse E, Ünal SS, Olçay M, Kınacı G (1997). Değişik Buğday Çeşitlerinde Süne Zararının Unun Reolojik Özelliklerine Etkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Türkiye 2. Değirmencilik Sanayii ve Teknolojisi Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitabı, Konya, s.185-196.
10. Olanca B, Köroğlu D, Sivri Özay D, Köksel H, Dönmez,E, Sanal T (2008). The Extent of Gluten Degradation in Bread Wheat Cultivars due to Bug (Eurygaster spp.) Proteases by SE-HPLC (H. KÖKSEL, U. UYGUN, and A. BAŞMAN editörler). Bosphorus 2008 ICC International Conference, ISBN 978-9944-0519-0-3, İstanbul, p.140.
11. Özkaya H, Özkaya B (1993). Buğday Kalitesi Süne ve Kımıl’ın Önemi. Un Mam. Dün.,2 (3):20-25.
12. Talay M (1997). Ekmek Bilimi ve Teknolojisi. Ray Filmcilik Matbaacılık, İstanbul, 120s.
TUİK (2013). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu.
http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul Erişim Tarihi: 24.07.2013