THE ROLE OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS, BELIEFS AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS IN PREDICITING CREATIVE THINKING PROFICIENCY AMONG ADOLESCENTS IN NORTH MACEDONIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47054/IJERT257191lKeywords:
critical thinking, PISA 2022, creative self-efficacy, curiosity, growth mindset on creativity, imagination and adventurousness, openness to art and reflectionAbstract
This research investigates the role of students’ academic achievements in mathematics, science, and reading literacy, their beliefs and attitudes about their own creativity and demographic and contextual factors in predicting creative thinking proficiency among 15 years old students in the Republic of North Macedonia. Data for the research are based on the 2022 cycle of the Programme for International Students Assessment (PISA). Creative thinking is defined as the competence to engage productively in the generation, evaluation, and improvement of ideas that can result in original and effective solutions, advances in knowledge, and impactful expressions of imagination. It is operationalized through three ideation processes (generating diverse ideas, generating creative ideas, and evaluating and improving ideas) and four domains (written expression, visual expression, social problem solving, and scientific problem solving). The sample is consisted of 4,169 fifteen years old students that have complete data on all predictors. Results from the linear multiple regression analysis show that mathematics (β = .25), science (β = .21), and reading literacy (β = .17) are the strongest positive predictors of creative thinking, stressing the foundational role of academic skills. Demographic and contextual factors, including language of instruction, gender, educational track, and economic, social, and cultural status, also are significant predictors. But, attitudinal variables such as creative self-efficacy, curiosity, growth mindset on creativity, imagination and adventurousness and openness to art and reflection had minimal predictive power. These research findings show that strengthening creative thinking in North Macedonia requires raising foundational literacy skills, students must first be supported to reach the level of understanding that allows them to apply, extend, and transform their knowledge in new ways. They also highlight the need for educational policies and practices that integrate creativity-supportive instruction and cultivate growth-oriented mindsets in both teachers and students.
References
Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. In The creative self Academic Press. 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00001-7
Berzonsky, M. D., & Sullivan, C. (1992). Social-cognitive aspects of identity style: Need for cognition, experiential openness, and introspection. Journal of adolescent research, 7(2), 140-155.https://doi.org/10.1177/074355489272002
Chávez-Eakle, R. (2009). Creativity and 16 Personality. Measuring creativity, 245.
Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity research journal, 18(3), 391-404.
Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological bulletin, 53(4), 267.
Ministry of Education and Science. (2021a). Concept for Primary Education. Ministry of Education and Science.
Ministry of Education and Science. (2021b). National standards for students in primary education. Ministry of Education and Science.
Mullis, I. V. S., von Davier, M., Foy, P., Fishbein, B., Reynolds, K. A., & Wray, E. (2023). PIRLS 2021 international results in reading. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://doi.org/10.6017/lse.tpisc.tr2103.kb5342
Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. ETS Research Report Series, 1992(1), i-30.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. OECD publishing.https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume III): Creative minds, creative schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/765ee8c2- en
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2025). Results from TALIS 2024: The State of Teaching. TALIS, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/90df6235-en.
von Davier, M., Kennedy, A., Reynolds, K., Fishbein, B., Khorramdel, L., Aldrich, C., Bookbinder, A., Bezirhan, U., & Yin, L. (2024). TIMSS 2023 international results in mathematics and science. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://doi. org/10.6017/lse.tpisc.timss.rs6460
Warm, T. A. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika, 54(3), 427-450.