ETIČNE SPLOŠNOSTI IN PARTIKULARIZEM

  • Vojko Strahovnik University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Abstract

I discuss varieties of ethical generalities that appear in the area between strict moral generalism and radical particularism. Arguments in support for particularism are presented, especially in relation to the question what kinds of generalities moral particularism may allow for. I discuss R. Audi’s model of moderate particularism that preserves prima facie duties, all in putting them into a complex normative and deliberative structure that is supposed to be «holism friendly». Next, M. Little and M. Lance version of particularism building upon defeasible principles is presented. J. Dancy’s particularism and his idea of a default reason are then discussed. I propose that interpreting prima facie duties in terms of tendencies may help to understand the status and workings of ethical generalities consistent with particularism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristotel. Nikomahova etika / Aristotel. Ljubljana: Slovenska matica. 1994
Audi R. The Good in the Right / R. Audi. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
Brink D.O. Moral Conflict and Its Structure / D.O. Brink // Moral Dilemmas and Moral
Theory. H.E. Mason (ur.). New York, Oxford: OUP, 1996. Р. 26-102.
Dancy J. Ethical Particularism and Morally Relevant Properties / J. Dancy // Mind.
1983. Vol. 92. P. 47-530.
Dancy J. Ethics without Principles / J. Dancy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.
Dancy J. Moral Reasons / J. Dancy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1993.
Dancy J. The Particularist’s Progress / J. Dancy // Moral Particularism / B. Hooker
and M. Little (ur.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000. Р. 56-130.
Lance M. et. al. Challenging Moral Particularism / M. Lance, M. Potrč. //
Strahovnik V. (ur.). London: Routledge, 2007.
Lance M. et. al. Defending Moral Particularism / M. Lance, M. Little //
Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory / J. Dreier (ur.). Oxford: Blackwell,
2006. Р. 21-305.
McKeever S. et. al. Principled Ethics – Generalism as a Regulative Ideal /
S. McKeever, M. Ridge. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.
McKeever S. et. al. The Many Moral Particularisms / S. McKeever, M. Ridge //
Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 2005. Vol. 35. P. 83-106.
McNaughton D. Moral Vision / D. McNaughton. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.
Pietroski P.M. Prima facie Obligations, Ceteris paribus Laws in Moral Theory /
P.M. Pietroski. 1993. Ethics 103: 489-515.
Ross W.D. The Foundations of Ethics / W.D. Ross. Oxford: OUP, 1939.
Ross W.D. The Right and the Good / W.D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930.
Strahovnik V. Intuicionizem, moralni konflikt in pluralizem dolžnosti /
V. Strahovnik // Analiza. 2005a. № 4. S. 29-106.
Strahovnik V. Etika bez moralnyh principov i pravil / V. Strahovnik. // Aktualnye
problemy filosofii, sociologii i politologii, ekonomiki i psihologii / Perm:
Permskij gosudarstvenyj universitet, 2005b. V. 7. S. 63-72.
Strahovnik V. Oris moralnega partikularizma / V. Strahovnik // Analiza. 2003. № 3.
Р. 33–55.
Published
2019-11-09
How to Cite
Strahovnik, V. (2019). ETIČNE SPLOŠNOSTI IN PARTIKULARIZEM. Philological Studies, 4(1). Retrieved from https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/philologicalstudies/article/view/800
Section
Philosophical-Cultural Problems