THE NEW MATERIALISM: ARGUMENTATION THROUGH THE PRISM OF CINEMATIC NARRATIVE STRUCTURES
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 30, 2018
Keywords:
latent humanism, destabilization, nonhuman ontology, late capitalism
Main Article Content
Abstract
What is the ontological status of a character in narrative in the wake of the new materialist turn? This essay presents an examination of the latent humanism at work in the conception of character. I begin with the destabilization of the category of human made possible by Gilles Deleuze’s work on perturbation. I also rely on more recent calls for a nonhuman ontology of critique in the work of Lauren Berlant and Jane Bennett, and argue that an anticharacterological reading of a narrative might reveal more about why things happen to people in the neoliberal matrix of late capitalism.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Srbinovska , Slavica. 2018. “THE NEW MATERIALISM: ARGUMENTATION THROUGH THE PRISM OF CINEMATIC NARRATIVE STRUCTURES”. Journal of Contemporary Philology 1 (1), 171-91. https://doi.org/10.37834/JCP1810171s.
Section
Culture
Copyright © 2014 Blaže Koneski Faculty of Philology, Skopje
Journal of Contemporary Philology (JCP)
Современа филологија
References
Rancière, J. (2000). Le partage du sensible: Esthétique et politique. Paris: La Fabrique-éditions.
Badiou, A. (1988). L’êtreetl’évenément. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Bennett, J. (2015). System and things: On vital materialism and object-oriented philosophy. In R. Grusin (ed.). The nonhuman turn, 223–239. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2010). The politics of “Life Itself” and new ways of dying. In D. Cooleand and S. Fros (eds.). New materialisms: Ontology, agency and politics, 201–218. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Foucault, M. (2004). Surveiller et punir: Naissancedela prison. Paris: Copyleft Yuji.
Deleuze, G. (1968). Différence et répétition. Paris: Press Universitaires de France.
Deneen, P. J. (2018). Why liberalism failed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Marcuse, H. (2002). One-dimensional man. London and NewYork: Routledge.
Pfeifer. G. (2015). The new materialism: Althusser, Badiou, Žižek. London and NewYork: Routledge.
Trhrift, N. (2005). Knowing capitalism. London: Sage Publications.
Žižek, S. (2009). Discipline between two freedoms: Madness and habit in German idealism. In G. Markus and S. Žižek (eds.). Mythology, madness, and laughter: Subjectivity in German Idealism, 95–121. NewYork and London: Continuum.
Badiou, A. (1988). L’êtreetl’évenément. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Bennett, J. (2015). System and things: On vital materialism and object-oriented philosophy. In R. Grusin (ed.). The nonhuman turn, 223–239. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2010). The politics of “Life Itself” and new ways of dying. In D. Cooleand and S. Fros (eds.). New materialisms: Ontology, agency and politics, 201–218. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Foucault, M. (2004). Surveiller et punir: Naissancedela prison. Paris: Copyleft Yuji.
Deleuze, G. (1968). Différence et répétition. Paris: Press Universitaires de France.
Deneen, P. J. (2018). Why liberalism failed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Marcuse, H. (2002). One-dimensional man. London and NewYork: Routledge.
Pfeifer. G. (2015). The new materialism: Althusser, Badiou, Žižek. London and NewYork: Routledge.
Trhrift, N. (2005). Knowing capitalism. London: Sage Publications.
Žižek, S. (2009). Discipline between two freedoms: Madness and habit in German idealism. In G. Markus and S. Žižek (eds.). Mythology, madness, and laughter: Subjectivity in German Idealism, 95–121. NewYork and London: Continuum.