CARBON FOOTPRINT AND EMISSION REDUCTION STRATEGIES IN MILK PROCESSING PLANTS: TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE DAIRY PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Fluid milk production and processing have a significant impact on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, posing risks to global climate stability. This study aimed to quantify the carbon footprint and identify major sources of GHG emissions in three milk processing plants and exploring strategies for emission reduction. The selected plants, referred to as MP1, MP2, and MP3, represented different capacities. Data collection involved visits and surveys at the dairies, gathering information on energy consumption and fuel usage. Emissions were categorized into three scopes: Scope 1 (direct emissions), Scope 2 (indirect emissions from purchased electricity), and Scope 3 (optional emissions beyond the company's control). Direct CO2e emissions per unit of processed milk were 83.91, 96.12, and 115.71 kg CO2e /t for MP1, MP2, and MP3, respectively. Emission reduction strategies were proposed, including substituting energy sources with lower GHG potential, replacing refrigerants with lower global warming potentials, improving energy efficiency, and optimizing raw milk procurement and product distribution. It is recommended that milk processing plants establish reduction targets for GHG emissions, focusing on overall emissions and emissions per unit of final product. According to this study, milk processing sectors need to assess and reduce their carbon footprints. Putting emission reduction measures into practice can make dairy production more climate-smart, ensuring the sustainability and effectiveness of milk production.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Guidelines to Defra / DECC‘s GHG (2011) Conversion Factors for Company Reporting: Methodology Paper for Emission Factors
Hospido, A., Moreira, M.T., Feijoo, G., (2003). Simplified life cycle assessment of galician milk production. International Dairy Journal 13, 783–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(03)00100-6
Kosmadakis, G., Landelle, A., Lazova, M. Manolakos, D., Kaya, A., Huisseune, H., Karavas, C.S., Tauveron, N., Revellin, R., Haberschill, P., Paepe, M.D., Papadakis, G. (2016) Experimental testing of a low-temperature organic Rankine cycle (ORC) engine coupled with concentrating PV/thermal collectors: Laboratory and field tests. Energy 117:222–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.047
Liu, T.C., Wu, Y.C., Chau, C,F. (2023) An Overview of Carbon Emission Mitigation in the Food Industry: Efforts, Challenges, and Opportunities. Processes. 11:1993. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11071993
Milani, F.X.; Nutter, D.; Thoma, G. (2011) Invited Review: Environmental Impacts of Dairy Processing and Products: A Review. Journal of Dairy Science, 94, 4243–4254, doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3955.
Nutter, D.W., Kim, D.-S., Ulrich, R., Thoma, G., (2013. Greenhouse gas emission analysis for USA fluid milk processing plants: Processing, packaging, and distribution. International Dairy Journal, Carbon and Water Footprint of U.S. Milk, From Farm to Table 31, S57–S64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2012.09.011
Gerber P., T. Vellinga T., C. Opio C., Henderson B., Steinfeld H. (2010) Greenhouse gas emissions from the dairy sector – A life cycle assessment, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Animal Production and Health Division, Rome, Italy
Reavis, M., Ahlen, J., Rudek, J., Naithani, K. Evaluating Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Mitigation Goals of the Global Food and Beverage Sector. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2022;5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.789499
Tan, A., Nutter, D. W., Milani, F. (2011). GHG emissions and energy use from a multi-product dairy processing plant. In Proceedings of the 2011 ASME Early Career Technical Conference (ECTC). American Society of Mechanical Engineers Fayetteville, AR, USA.
https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/topics/in-depth/climate-change-mitigation-reducing-emissions