EXAMINATION OF THE PHENOTYPIC VARIABILITY OF THE MUSCAT HAMBURG VARIETY IN THE SKOPJE VINEYARD AS A BASIS FOR ISOLATING CLONES

Main Article Content

Biljana Korunoska
Vladan Pešić
Klime Beleski
Stevan Stojković

Abstract

Our studies included some autochthonous and regional grape varieties grown in the Republic of North Macedonia. The autochthonous varieties were examined - White winter, Konchanka, Stanushina, Ohrid black and Ohrid white, and the regional varieties - Vranec, Prokupec, Smederevka, Zilavka and Zupljanka were examined. The tests were divided into three methodological units. The first method was applied to all varieties - data collection, history and comparison with other tests. The second method was performed on all varieties - ampelographic identification because we had samples from all varieties. In some of the varieties, the third method was performed, that is, genetic (DNA) identification was made in the period from 2010 to 2020 in different examination centers and at different times. The results are compared with the results of a study by Professor M. Aradhya of the USDA Research Center, Davis CA, USA. He has performed a wide range of genetic identification on a number of autochthonous varieties in Europe and Asia, including varieties in the Balkans. With the second method of examination - ampelographic identification according to O.I.V. descriptors we got the most realistic results. An ampelographic description of certain characteristics of the individual organs of the vine was performed and it was concluded that the varieties according to their anatomical and physiological characteristics belong to 2 groups: ecological-geographical group Black Sea varieties, subgroup Balcanica and ecological-geographical group Eastern varieties, subgroup Antasiatica.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Anhalt U.C.M., Crespo Martínez S., Rühl E., Forneck A. (2011). Dynamic grapevine clones an AFLP - marker study of the Vitis vinifera cultivar Riesling comprising 86 clones. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 7, 4: 739-746, DOI: 10.1007/s11295-011-0370-x.
Aradhya M. K. et al. (2003). Genetic structure and differentiation in cultivated grape Vitis Vinifera L. Genet. Res. Camb. 81. Pp. 179-192. Cambridge, UK.
Arregui J.M., Lopez M. M., Juarez J., Duran-Vila N., Garcia de Lujan A. (1988). OIV, 68 eme Assemblee Generalle, 5-9 septembre, Paris.
Korunoska B. (2007). "Ampelographic identification, study and collection of autochthonous varieties of vines in the Republic of Macedonia". Doctoral dissertation. Skopje.
Blaich R., Konradi J., Ruhl E., Forneck A. (2007). Assessing Genetic Variation among Pinot noir (Vitis vinifera L.) Clones with AFLP Markers. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 58, 4: 526-529.
Bodor, P., Baranyai, L., Bálo, B., Tóth, E., Strever, A., Hunter, J.J. & Bisztray,
Gy.D., (2012). G.R.A.L.E.D. (Grapevine Lеaf Digitalization) software for the
detection and graphic reconstruction of ampelometric differences between
Vitis leaves. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 33(1), 1-6.
Božinović Z. (2010). Ampelografija. Akademik. Skopje.
Cretazzo E., Meneghetti S., De Andrés M.T., Gaforio L., Frare E., Cifre J. (2010). Clone differentiation and varietal identification by means of SSR, AFLP, SAMPL and M-AFLP in order to assess the clonal selection of grapevine: the case study of Manto Negro, Callet and Moll, autochthonous cultivars of Majorca. Annals of applied biology, 157, 2: 213- 227, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2010.00420.x.
Galet P. (1998). Cepages et vignobles de France. Tome I et II. Montpellier.
Hocquigny, S. et al. (2004). Diversification within grapevine cultivars goes through chimeric states. Genome 47, 579–589.
Houben, A.; Banaei-Moghaddam, A.M.; Klemme, S.; Timmis, J.N. (2014). Evolution and biology of supernumerary B chromosomes. Cellular and Molecular Life Science, Basel, v.71, n.3, p.467- 478,
Li, H.; Gao, Z.; Zahid, M.S.; Li, D.; Javed, H.U.; Wang, L.; Song, S.; Zhao, L.; Xu, W.; Zhang, C.; et al. (2020). Small RNA Sequencing Analysis of miRNA Expression Reveals Novel Insihts into Root Formation under Root Restriction Cultivation in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 3513.
Maul, E. (2004). Harmonization of IPGRI, OIV and UPOV descriptors for VITIS. IPGRI. 2004. Working Group on Vitis. First meeting – 12-14 June 2003 – Palic, Serbia and Montenegro.
OIV, Description of World Vine Varieties. (2007). Organisation Internationale de la Vigne et du Vin, Paris.
Riaz, S. et al. (2004). A microsatellite marker-based framework linkagemap of Vitis vinifera L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108, 864–872.
Sabır A., Kafkas S., Tangolar S., Buyukalaca S. (2008). Genetic relationship of grape cultivars by ISSR (Inter-simple sequence repeats) markers. European Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 73: 84–88.
Torregrosa L. (1995). Les techniques de regeneration in vitro. Progres Agricole et Viticole 112, No 22 – Special sitevi, 479-489.
Vos P., Hogers R., Bleeker M., Reijans M., Lee T.V.D., Hornes M., Friters A., Pot J., Paleman J., Kuiper M., Zabeau M. (1995). AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research, 23, 21: 4407-4414, DOI: 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407.
Zhang, M., Su, H., Gresshoff, P.M., Ferguson, B.J. (2021). Shoot-derived miR2111 controls legume root and nodule development. Plant Cell Environ. 44, 1627–1641.
http://www.oiv.org
http://www.ecpgr.cgiar.org/Databases/Crops /Vitis.htm
http://www.vivc.de
www.statisticshell.com
Grape varieties - list (techinfus.com)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA808789 accessed on 20 February 2022.
https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13091547/s1.
European Vitis database (www.eu-vitis.de), ©JKI 2007-2011.