УЛОГАТА НА АЛЕЛОПАТИЈАТА ВО БОРБАТА ПРОТИВ ПЛЕВЕЛИТЕ THE ROLE OF ALELOPATY IN FIGHT AGAINST WEEDS

Main Article Content

Beti Ivanovska

Abstract

Allelopathy is a new field of research in crop production. The plants are producing physiologically active compounds during their ontogenetic and phylogenetic development, that offer many environmental advantages against the biotic agents especially weeds. Although, their use during the twentieth century was marginal and not enough practiced as the other methods to combat weed species. As a matter of fact, the underdeveloped and developing countries are not sufficiently familiar with the role of the allelopathy against weeds in crop production, because of the use of conventional methods for this purpose. The study of the physiologically active compounds (allelochemicals) provides new ways of using these compounds for protecting cultivated plants from weeds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Abdul - Rahman, A.A. and Habib, S.A. (1989). Allelopathic effect of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) on bladygrass (Imperata cylindrica). Journal of Chemical Ecology 15: 2289-2300.
2. Akram, M. and Hussain, F. (1987). The possible role of allelopathy exhibited by root extracts and exudates of Chinese cabbage in hydroponics. Pakistan Journal of Science and Industrial Research 30: 918- 920.
3. Alderman, W.H. and Middleton, J.A. (1925). Toxic relations of other crops to tomatoes. Proceeding, American Society of Horticultural Science 22: 307-308.
4. Bonner, J. (1960). Liberation of organic substances from higher plants and their role in soil sickness problem. Botanical Review 26: 393-424.
5. Bradow, J.M. and Connick Jr., W.J. (1987). Allelochemicals from palmer amaranth, (Amarnathus palmeri S. Wats). Journal of Chemical Ecology 13: 185-202.
6. De Candolle, M.A.P. (1832). Physiologie Vegetale. Tome III, Bechet Jeune, Paris. Pp. 1474-1475.
7. Dzyubenko, N.N. and Petrenko, N.I. (1971). On biochemical interactions of cultivated plants and weeds. In: Physiological and Biochemical Interactions Between the Plants in Phytocenosis (Ed., A.M. Grodzinsky) Vol. 2: 60-66. Naukova Dumka, Kiev, USSR
8. Dzyubenko, N.N. and Krupa, L.I. (1974). On interactions of cultivated plants vegetation and weeds in agrophytocenoses. In: Physiological and Biochemical Interactions Between the Plants in Phytocenosis (Ed., A.M. Grodzinsky) Vo1. 5: 55-56. Naukova Dumka, Kiev, USSR.
9. Einhelling, F.A. (1985). Allelopathy-a natural protection allelochemics. In: Handbook of Natural Pesticides Methods. Theory, Practice and Detection (Ed., N.B. Mandava) 1: 161-200. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
10. Guenzi, W.D. and Mc calla, T.M. and Norstadt, F. (1967). Presence and persistence of phytotoxic substances in wheat, oat, corn and sorghum residues. Agronomy Journal 59: 163-165.
11. Horricks, J.S. (1969). Influence of rape residue on cereal production. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 49: 632-634.
12. HAQ, I.U. and HUSSAIN, F. (1979). Pak. Tobacco 3: 17-19.
13. James, K.L., Banks, P.A. and Karnok, K.J. (1988). Interference of soybean (Glycine max) cultivars with sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia). Weed Technology 2: 404-409.
14. Костов. Т. (2003):Општо полделство, Универзитет „Св. Кирил и Методиј”- Скопје, Факултет за земјоделски науки и храна - Скопје.
15. Костов. Т. (2006): Хербологија, Универзитет „Св. Кирил и Методиј”- Скопје, Факултет за земјоделски науки и храна - Скопје.Levitt, J., Lovett, J.V. and Garlick, P.R. (1984). Datura stramonium allelochemicals: Longevity in soil and ultrastructural effects on root tip cells of Helianthus annuus L. New Phytol. 97: 213-218.
16. Levitt, J. and Lovett, J.V. (1984). Activity of allelochemicals of Datura stramonium L. (thorn-apple) in contrasting soil types. Plant and Soil, 79: 181-189.
17. Lovett, J.V., Levitt, J., Duffield, A.M. and Smith, N.G. (1981). Allelopathic potential of Daturastramonium L. (Thorn-apple). Weed Res. 21: 165-170.
18. Lockerman, R.H. and Putnam, A.R. (1981b). Mechanisms for different interferences among cucumber (Cucumis
sativus L.) accessions. Botanical Gazette 142: 427-430.
19. Lovett, J.V. (1982). Allelopathy and self-defence in plants. Australian Weeds 2: 33-36.
20. Mann, H.H. and Barnes, T.W. (1947). The competition between barley and certain weeds under controlled conditions. II. Competition with Holcus mollis. Annals of Applied Biology 34: 252-267.
21. Mann, H.H. аnd Barnes, T.W. (1945). The competition between barley and certain weeds under controlled conditions. Annals of Applied Biology 32: 15-22.
22. Mann, H.H. and Barnes, T.W. (1947). The competition between barley and certain weeds under controlled conditions. II. Competition with Holcus mollis. Annals of Applied Biology 34: 252-267.
23. Martin, P. and Rademacher, B. (1960). Studies on the mutual influences of weeds and crops. Symposium of British Ecological Society 1: 143-152.
24. Massantini, F., Caporali, F. and Zellini, G. (1977). EWRS Symposium on Different Methods of Weed Control and their Integration 1: 23-30.
25. Norman, A.G. (1959). In: Proceedings, Soil Science Society of America 23: 368-370.
26. Oleszek, W. and Jurzysta, M. (1987). Plant and Soil 98: 67-80.
27. Overland, L. (1966). The role of allelopathic substances in the barley crop. American Journal of Botany 53: 423-432.
28. Oudhia, P., Kolhe, S.S. and Tripathi, R.S. (1998). Germination and seedling vigor of chickpea as affected by allelopathy of Datura stramonium L. ICPN 5: 22-24.
29. Patrick, Z.A. (1971). Phytotoxic substances associated with the decomposition of plant residues in soil. Soil Science 111: 13-18.
30. Putnam, A. R. and Defrank, J. (1983). Use of phytotoxic plant residues for selective weed control. Crop Protection 2: 173-181.
31. Putnam, A.R. and Duke. (1974). Biological suppression of weeds: Evidence for allelopathy in accessions of cucumber. Science 185: 370-71.
32. Putnam, A.R. and Duke, W.B. (1978). Alleopathy in agro-ecosystems. Annual Review of Phyopat. 16: 431-451.
33. Reting, B., Holm, L.G. and Struckmeyer, B.E. (1972). Effects of weeds on the anatomy of roots of cabbage and tomato. Weed Sci. 20: 33-36.
34. Rice, R.L. (1979). Allelopathy: an update. Botanical Review 45: 15-109.
35. http://utcan.ut.ac.ir/weed/files%5Cconferences%5C1ndIWSCP.pdf
36. Toussoun, T.A. and Patrick, Z.A. (1963). Phytopathology 53: 265-270
37. Šćepanović, M., Novak, N., Barić, K., Ostojić, Z., Galzina G. and Goršić M. 2007. Allelopathic effect of two weed species, Abutilon theophrasti Med. and Datura stramonium L. on germination and early growth of corn. Agronom. gla. 6: 459-472.
38. You, L.X. and Wang, S.J. (2011). Chemical composition and allelopathic potential of the essential oil from Datura stramonium L. Advanced Materials Res. (233 - 235): 2472-2475.
39. Walker, D.W. and Jenkins, D.D. (1986). Influence of sweet potato plant residue on growth of sweet potato vine cuttings and cowpea plants. Hort Science 21: 426-428.
40. Waller, G.R., Kenzer, F.G. and Mcpherson, J.K. (1987). Allelopathic compounds in soil from no tillage versus
conventional tillage in wheat production. Plant and Soil 98: 5-15.
41. Wilson, R.E. and Rice, E.L. (1968). Allelopathy as expressed by Helianthus annuus and its role in old- field succession. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 95: 432-448.