EFFICIENCY OF INSTALLED COOLING SYSTEMS IN DAIRY BARNS DURING HOT SEASON

Main Article Content

Metodija Trajchev
Dimitar Nakov

Abstract

Hot season of the year has profound effects on the production, health, profitability, and welfare of dairy cows. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of cooling systems in controlling the microclimate condition inside the two dairy barns. There was set out to compare the ambient conditions inside the barn with environmental weather data obtained from local meteorological station. The experiment was carried out at the height of summer (from 15th of June to 31st of August) in two familiar dairy farms. Within the barns air temperature, relative humidity and their ratio expressed as temperature humidity index (THI) were measured hourly during the trial period using data loggers. The Pearson’s coefficient of correlation demonstrates that climate condition inside the barns and the official local meteorological station significantly correlate. The air
temperature and THI were significantly higher in the Farm 1 (1.53±0.2390C higher, t=6.420; p<0.001, and 2.05±0.344 units higher, t=5.973; p<0.001, respectively) and in the Farm 2 (1.65±0.2520C higher, t=6.549; p<0.001, and 2.12±0.357 units higher, t=5.927; p<0.001, respectively) compare with the environmental weather data. The method of GLM, multivariate procedure, showed that there was statistical significant differences in the minimal values for daily microclimate parameters inside the barns before and after installation of cooling equipment. However, the interaction between the farm and cooling system, months and days of hot summer season showed statistical significant influence on the microclimate conditions inside the cow barns with exception for the maximal values for air temperature and THI. In conclusion, due to farm specific and unpredictable variability in climate conditions inside the cow barns and their correlation with environmental weather data, the installed cooling systems could provide better climate zone in the barns for increased milk production but
couldn’t completely satisfy capacity of cooling during the day time with highest air temperature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

1. Armstrong, D.V., Hillman, P.E., Meyer, M.J., Smith, J.F. and Stokes, S.R. (1999). Heat stress management in freestall barns in the western US. Proceedings of the Western Dairy Management Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
2. Berman, A., Folman, Y., Kaim, M., Mamen, M., Herz, Z., Wolfenson, D., Arieli, A. and Graber, Y. (1985). Upper critical temperatures and forced ventilation effects for high-yielding dairy cows in a subtropical climate. J. Dairy Sci. 68: 1488–1495.
3. Berman, A. (2009). Predicted limits for evaporative cooling in heat stress relief of cattle in warm conditions. J. Anim. Sci. 87: 3413–3417.
4. Bohmanova, J., Misztal, I., Cole. J.B. (2007). Temperature-humidity indices as indicators of milk production losses due to heat stress. J. Dairy Sci. 90:1947-1956.
5. Collier, R.J., Dahl, G.E., VanBaale, M.J. (2006). Major advances associated with environmental effects on dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci, 89: 1244-1253.
6. Garcia-Ispierto, I., Lopez-Gatius, F., Santolaria, P., Yaniz, J.L., Nogareda, C., Lopez-Bejar, M. and De Rensis, F. (2006). Relationship between heat stress during the peri-implantation period and early fetal loss in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 65: 799–807.
7. Kadzere, C.T., Murphy, M.R., Silanikove, N., Maltz, E. (2002). Heat stress in lactating dairy cows: a review. Livest Prod Sci, 77: 59-91.
8. Khongdee, S., Chaiyabutr, N., Hinch, G., Markvichitr, K. and Vajrabukka, C. (2006). Effects of evaporative cooling on reproductive performance and milk production of dairy cows in hot wet conditions. International Journal of Biometeorology, 50:30.
9. Rhoads, M.L., Rhoads, R.P., VanBaale, M.J., Collier, R.J., Sanders, S.R., Weber, W.J., Crooker, B.A., Baumgard, L.H. (2009). Effects of heat stress and plane of nutrition on lactating Holstein cows: I. Production, metabolism, and aspects of circulating somatotropin. J. Dairy Sci. 92:1986-1997.
10. Schuller, L.K., Burfeind, O. and Heuwieser. W. (2013). Short communication: Comparison of ambient temperature, relative humidity, and temperature-humidity index between on-farm measurements and official meteorological data. J. Dairy Sci. 96: 7731–7738.
11. Shoshani, E. and Hetzroni, A. (2013). Optimal barn characteristics for high-yielding Holstein cows as derived by a new heat-stress model. Animal 7: 176–182.
12. Silanikove, N. (2000). Effects of heat stress on the welfare of extensively managed domestic ruminants. Livest Prod Sci, 67: 1-18.
13. Trajchev, M., Nakov, D., Andonov, S. (2016). The effect of thermal environment on daily milk yield of dairy cows. Mac Vet Rev, Vol. 39(2), pg. 185-192.
14. Winsten, J.R., Kerchner, C.D., Richardson, A., Lichau, A. and Hyman, J.M. (2010). Trends in the northeast dairy industry: Large-scale modern confinement feeding and management-intensive grazing. J. Dairy Sci. 93:1759–1769.
15. Zimbleman, R.B., Rhoads, R.P., Rhoads, M.L., Duff, G.C., Baumgard, L.H. and Collier, R.J. (2009). A re-evaluation of the impact of temperature humidity index (THI) and black globe humidity index (BGHI) on milk production in high producing dairy cows. Pages 158–168 in 24th Annu. Southwest Nutrition Management Conf., Temple, AZ. University of Arizona, Tucson.