THE EVALUATION OF GRAIN AND OIL PRODUCTION, SOME PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF AMARANTH ‘CV. KONIZ’ AS INFLUENCED BY THE SALT STRESS IN HYDROPONIC CONDITIONS

Main Article Content

M. Yarnia
M.B.K. Benam
E. Farajzadeh
V. Ahmadzadeh
N. Nobari

Abstract

The purpose of this study was investigation of salinity effect on some traits of Amaranth. A split plot designed with three replications with two factors: 5 salinity levels (control, 75, 150, 225, 300 mM NaCl) and applied time at 4 levels (plant establishment, branching, flowering, grain filling) in a greenhouse under hydroponic system. Application of 300 mM salinity after plant establishment led to death of amaranth. Salinity application after establishment decreased significantly plant height and number of branches as 44.9 and 31.8, respectively. Production of grain weight was not affected by 75 mM salinity, but at higher salinity showed significantly decrease. The highest decrease in grain weight obtained by applying 225 mM salt after the plant establishment and salinity at 300 mM after branching as 86.6 and 71.3 percent respectively, resulting in a decrease in both 1000 kernel weight and grain number, respectively. Salinity application increased H2O2, MDA and total phenolics contents, severely. Most of characteristics hadnot affect by 75 mM NaCl, but other concentrations had a negative effect on the growth and production of Amaranth and increasing salinity had more negative impact. In this study, the most sensitive to salinity was after plant establishment and grain filling stage was the most tolerant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Almodares, A., M.R. Hadi and B. Dosti .2008. The effect of salt stress on growth parameters and carbohydrate contents in sweet sorghum. Research Journal of Environmental Science. 2(4): 298-304.
Beveridge, C.A., J.L. Weller, S.R. Singer, and J.M.I. Hofer. 2003. Auxillary meristem development. Budding relationships between networks controlling flowering, branching, and photoperiod responsiveness. Plant Physiology. 131: 927-934.
Borneo, R., and A. Aguirre. 2008. Chemical composition, cooking quality cereals, and consumer acceptance of pasta made with dried Amaranth leaves flour. LWT Food Science and Technology. 41: 1748 1751.
Dave, D.S., and N.K. Patel. 2011. Salinity effect on Amaranthus lividus Linn. (Amaranthaceae) in relation of physiological and biochemical aspects. Life Sciences Leaflets 21: 1018-1042.
Gaber, M.A. 2010. Antioxidative defense under salt stress. Plant Signal Behav. 5(4): 369-374.
Gelalcha, S., and R.R. Hanchinal. 2013. Correlation and path analysis in yield and yield components in spring bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under irrigated condition in Southern India. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 8(24): 3186-3192.
Jaleel, C.A., B. Sankar, R. Sridharan, and R. Panneerselvam. 2008. Soil salinity alters growth, chlorophyll content, and secondary metabolite accumulation in Catharanthus roseus. Turkish Journal of Biology. 32: 79-83.
Mahajan, S., G.K. Pandey, and N. Tuteja. 2008. Calcium and salt-stress signaling in plants: Shedding light on SOS pathway. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 471(2): 146–158.
Meloni, D.A., M.A. Oliva, C.A. Martinez, and J. Cambraria. 2003. Photosynthesis and activity of superoxide dismutase peroxidase and glutathione reductase in cotton under salt stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 49: 69-76.
Munns, R., and M. Tester. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review Plant Biology. 59: 651–681.
Nenova, V. 2008. Growth and mineral concentrations of pea plants under different salinity levels and iron supply. Genetic Apply Plant Physiol. 34 (3-4): 189-202.
Noreen, Z., and M. Ashraf. 2009. Assessment of variation in antioxidative defense system in salt-treated pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars and its putative use as salinity tolerance markers. J. Plant Physiol. 166(16): 1764-1774.
Omami, E.N. 2005. Response of amaranth to salinity stress. Department of Plant Production and Soil Science. Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences. University of Pretoria.
Omami, E.N., P.S. Hammes, and P.J. Robbertse. 2006. Differences in salinity tolerance for growth and water use efficiency in some amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) genotypes. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science. 34(1): 11-22.
Pospisil, A., M. Pospisil, B. Varga, Z. Svecnjak. 2006. Grain yield and protein concentration of two amaranth species (Amaranthus spp.) as influenced by the nitrogen fertilization. European Journal of Agronomy. 25: 250 253
Tijen, D., and T. Ismail. 2005. Comparative lipid peroxidation, antioxidant defense systems and proline content in roots of two rice cultivar differing in salt tolerance. Env. Exp. Bot. 53(3): 247-257.
Vega, J.M., I. Garbayo, M.J. Domınguez, and J. Vigara. 2006. Effect of abiotic stress on photosynthesis and respiration in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: induction of oxidative stress. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 40(1): 163–167.
Velikova, V., I. Yordanov, and A. Edreva. 2000. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain treated bean plants, protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 151: 59–66.
Wang, X., G. Zhao, H. Gu. 2009. Physiological and antioxidant responses of three leguminous species to saline environment during seed germination stage. African Journal of Biotechnology. 8(21): 5773-5779.
Wang, Y., and X. Li. 2008. Salt stress-induced cell reprogramming, cell fate switch and adaptive plasticity during root hair development in Arabidopsis. Plant Signaling and Behavior. 3(7): 436-438.