Self-Mentions in Climate Change Discourse by King Charles III
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 13, 2024
Keywords:
a corpus-assisted study, climate change discourse, King Charles III, self-mentions
Main Article Content
Abstract
Climate change discourse provides a fertile ground for research in communication, linguistics, and discourse studies (Grist 2008; Isopp 2024; Nerlich et al. 2010). Anchored in a quantitative linguistic paradigm, the article presents a mixed-methods study on the use of self-mentions (for instance, I, we, etc.) in a corpus of speeches on the topic of climate change delivered by King Charles III. The study aims at establishing the frequencies of the occurrence of self-mentions and learning about their pragmatic roles in the corpus. To that end, the corpus of King Charles III’s speeches on climate change was collected and analysed. The results of the corpus analysis indicated that I was the most frequent self-mention, which King Charles III utilised in order to impart a personalised dimension to his discourse on climate change. The findings and their discussion are further presented in the article.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Kapranov, Oleksandr. 2024. “Self-Mentions in Climate Change Discourse by King Charles III”. Journal of Contemporary Philology 7 (1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.37834/JCP2471029k.
Section
Linguistics
Copyright © 2014 Blaže Koneski Faculty of Philology, Skopje
Journal of Contemporary Philology (JCP)
Современа филологија
References
Anderson, A. (2013). ‘Together we can save the arctic’: celebrity advocacy and the Rio Earth Summit 2012. Celebrity Studies, 4 (3): 339–352.
Abusalim, N., Zidouni, S., Alghazo, S., Rababah, G. and Rayyan, M. (2022). Textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in political discourse: A case study. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2124683.
Ädel, A. (2023). Adopting a ‘move’ rather than a ‘marker’ approach to metadiscourse: A taxonomy for spoken student presentations. English for Specific Purposes, 69: 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.09.001.
Adger, W. N., Benjaminsen, T. A., Brown, K., and Svarstad, H. (2001). Advancing a political ecology of global environmental discourses. Development and Change, 32 (4): 681–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00222.
Afsari, S. and Kuhi, D. (2016). A functional investigation of self-mention in soft science master theses. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 9 (18): 49–64.
Albalat-Mascarell, A. (2023). Approaches to the analysis of metadiscourse features in political discourse. Complutense Journal of English Studies, 31: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5209/cjes.81534.
Albalat-Mascarell, A. and Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2019). Self-representation in political campaign talk: A functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 147: 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.011.
Anthony, L. (2022). AntConc Version 4.0.11. Tokyo: Waseda University.
Berrang-Ford, L., Ford, J. D., and Paterson, J. (2011). Are we adapting to climate change?. Global Environmental Change, 21 (1): 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.012.
Betts, S., Schutte, V., Scott, B. J., Storoschuk, J., Jones, A., and Harris, C. (2022). Studying Prince Philip: His life and legacies in context. Royal Studies Journal, 9 (2): 5–10. https://doi.org/10.21039/rsj.372.
Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate?: Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bozkurt, F. (2021). Risâletü'n-Nushiyye’de Bir Üstsöylem Ögesi olarak Kendinden Söz Etme. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23: 226–243.
Chen, S. and Nassaji, H. (2015). Self-mention and identity construction in statement of purpose. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1: 475–480.
Chiluwa, I. (2015). Radicalist discourse: a study of the stances of Nigeria's Boko Haram and Somalia's Al Shabaab on Twitter. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 10 (2): 214–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2015.1041964.
Diani, G. and Freddi, M. (2023). Authorial stance and identity building in weblogs by law scholars and scientists. In R. Plo-Alastrué and I. Corona (eds.) Digital scientific communication: Identity and visibility in research dissemination, 101–124. Cham: Springer.
Dong, J., Du, K. and Buckingham, L. (2024). Author self-reference in cross-linguistic/cultural and cross-disciplinary academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 101352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101352.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2023). Self-mention in L2 (Czech) learner academic discourse: Realisations, functions and distribution across master's theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64: 101272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101272.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2016). Cross-cultural variation in the use of hedges and boosters in academic discourse. Prague Journal of English Studies, 5 (1): 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjes-2016-0009.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. Ed. Martin Luther, Huck Gutman, and Patrick H. Hutton. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
Füssel, H. M. (2007). Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change, 17 (2): 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002.
Galaidin, A. and Bednárová-Gibová, K. (2023). A cross-disciplinary analysis of authorial voice in the rhetorical structures of research article abstracts in the fields of linguistics and economics written by native and non-native English speakers. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 40 (1): 35–60. https://doi.org/10.15290/cr.2023.40.1.02.
Gillings, M. and Dayrell, C. (2023). Climate change in the UK press: examining discourse fluctuation over time. Applied Linguistics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad007.
Grist, N. (2008). Positioning climate change in sustainable development discourse. Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association, 20 (6): 783–803. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1496.
Grothmann, T. and Patt, A. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15 (3): 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002.
Harwood, N. (2005). ‘Nowhere has anyone attempted… In this article I aim to do just that’: A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 37 (8): 1207–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.012.
Hryniuk, K. (2018). Expressing authorial self in research articles written by Polish and English native-speaker writers. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8 (3): 621-642. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.3.5.
Hůlková, I., Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., Jančaříková, R. and Schmied, J. (2019). Intercultural variation in academic discourse: Theme zones and the build-up of coherence in research articles. Topics in Linguistics, 20 (2): 33–53. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2019-0008.
Hutcheon, L. (2003). The politics of postmodernism. London: Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2020). The communication of expertise: changes in academic writing. In M. Gotti, S. Maci, and M. Sala (Eds.), Scholarly Pathways: Knowledge Transfer and Knowledge Exchange in Academia, 33–56. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
Hyland, K. (2015). Genre, discipline and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19: 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005.
Hyland, K. (2008). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies, 8 (2): 1–23.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7 (2): 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365.
Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20 (3): 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0.
Hyland, K. and Jiang, F. K. (2017). Is academic writing becoming more informal? English for Specific Purposes, 45: 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001.
IBM. (2011). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 20.0. New York: IBM.
Isopp, B. (2024). The politics of politicization: Climate change debates in Canadian print media. Public Understanding of Science, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231220226.
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Junnier, F. (2020). Finding voice in biology: A diachronic analysis of self-mention in the discussions of an L2 scholar. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 47: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100889.
Kapranov, O. (2015). Do international corporations speak in one voice on the issue of global climate change: The case of British Petroleum and The Royal Dutch Shell Group. In C. Can, A. Kilimci, and K. Papaja (eds.), Social sciences and humanities: A global perspective, 306–322. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
Kapranov, O. (2020). Self-mention in argumentative essays written by pre-service teachers of English. Beyond Philology. An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching, 17 (2): 97–128. https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2020.2.05.
Kapranov, O. (2021a). Self-mention in academic writing by in-service teachers of English: Exploring Authorial Voices. In M. Burada, O. Tatu, and R. Sinu (eds.) Exploring language variation, diversity and change, 76–100. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kapranov, O. (2021b). Self-mention in science communication associated with COVID-19 research: A comparison of computer-mediated communicative practices in the United Kingdom and the United States of America. American, British and Canadian Studies, 36: 131–153. https://doi.org/10.2478/abcsj-2021-0008.
Kapranov, O. (2021c). Self-mention in research sections of university websites in Estonia and the United Kingdom. BAS British and American Studies, 27: 57–69.
Kapranov, O. (2022). The syntax of climate change: Syntactic means in the construction of Greta Thunberg’s community identity on Facebook. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Philologia, 67 (4): 15–33. https://doi.org/ 10.24193/subbphilo.2022.4.01.
Kapranov, O. (2023a). Throwing soup at Van Gogh: The framing of art in climate change activism by British mass media. Discourses on Culture, 19 (1): 175–200. https://doi.org/10.2478/doc-2023-0008.
Kapranov, O. (2023b). Metonymy in online discourse on Facebook by Greenpeace Australia Pacific. Language: Codification, Competence, Communication, 2 (9): 7–25. https://doi.org/10.24025/2707-0573.9.2024.292828.
Kapranov, O. (2023c). Modal verbs in English-medium research articles on the issue of climate change and health. Acta Marisiensis. Philologia, 5 (5): 38–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/amph-2023-0084.
Kapranov, O. (2023d). Modality in sustainability discourse by Harrods and Liberty: Analysing British cultural icons’ discursive practices. Cultural Perspectives-Journal for Literary and British Cultural Studies in Romania, 28: 85–116.
Karahan, P. (2013). Self-mention in scientific articles written by Turkish and non-Turkish authors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70: 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.068.
Kashiha, H. (2022). On persuasive strategies: Metadiscourse practices in political speeches. Discourse and Interaction, 15 (1): 77–100. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2022-1-77.
Maňáková, M. (2021). Self-mention in the academic discourse of ELF writers. Topics in Linguistics, 22 (2): 32–46. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2021-0009.
Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N. and Brown, B. (2010). Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1 (1): 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.2.
Olmos-Lopez, P., Prudencio, F. E. and Novelo, A. (2022). Mexican economics professors’ publication: Three case studies. English for Specific Purposes, 66: 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.01.002.
O’Neill, S. J., Boykoff, M., Niemeyer, S., and Day, S. A. (2013). On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change, 23 (2): 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.006.
Rotaru, M. C. (2023). Representational choices of the visit of King Charles III to Romania in June 2023 in the speeches of President Klaus Iohannis and King Charles III – A comparative approach. Buletinul Științific al Universității Tehnice de Construcții București Seria: Limbi Străine și Comunicare, 16 (1): 46–62.
Sanz, R. L. (2011). The study of authorial voice: Using a Spanish–English corpus to explore linguistic transference. Corpora, 6 (1): 1–24.
Scheibman, J. (2004). Inclusive and exclusive patterning of the English first person plural: Evidence from conversation. In M. Achard and S. Kemmer (eds). Language, culture and mind, 377–396. Chicago: CSLI Publications.
Trepczyńska, M. (2016). “In this paper I will prove…”: The challenge behind authorial self-representation in L2 undergraduate research paper writing. In H. Chodkiewicz, P. Steinbrich and M. Krzemińska-Adamek (eds.) Working with text and around text in foreign language environments. Second language learning and teaching, 109–123. Cham: Springer.
Vučićević, A. L. and Rakić, A. D. (2023). Self-mention and engagement mechanisms of (negative) evaluation in linguistics academic reviews: A diachronic insight. Зборник радова Филозофског факултета у Приштини, 53 (4): 112–130. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrffp53-44003.
Wang, H. and Hu, Z. (2023). Changes in the ways authors refer to themselves: a diachronic study of self-mention in English research articles. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10 (1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02099-7.
Davies, C. (2021). The royal we: subtle transition as ageing Queen devolves more duties. The Guardian [Online], 29 October. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/oct/29/subtle-transition-as-ageing-queen-devolves-more-duties [Accessed: February 5th, 2024].
Primary Sources
www.royal.uk
Abusalim, N., Zidouni, S., Alghazo, S., Rababah, G. and Rayyan, M. (2022). Textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in political discourse: A case study. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2124683.
Ädel, A. (2023). Adopting a ‘move’ rather than a ‘marker’ approach to metadiscourse: A taxonomy for spoken student presentations. English for Specific Purposes, 69: 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.09.001.
Adger, W. N., Benjaminsen, T. A., Brown, K., and Svarstad, H. (2001). Advancing a political ecology of global environmental discourses. Development and Change, 32 (4): 681–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00222.
Afsari, S. and Kuhi, D. (2016). A functional investigation of self-mention in soft science master theses. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 9 (18): 49–64.
Albalat-Mascarell, A. (2023). Approaches to the analysis of metadiscourse features in political discourse. Complutense Journal of English Studies, 31: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5209/cjes.81534.
Albalat-Mascarell, A. and Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2019). Self-representation in political campaign talk: A functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 147: 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.011.
Anthony, L. (2022). AntConc Version 4.0.11. Tokyo: Waseda University.
Berrang-Ford, L., Ford, J. D., and Paterson, J. (2011). Are we adapting to climate change?. Global Environmental Change, 21 (1): 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.012.
Betts, S., Schutte, V., Scott, B. J., Storoschuk, J., Jones, A., and Harris, C. (2022). Studying Prince Philip: His life and legacies in context. Royal Studies Journal, 9 (2): 5–10. https://doi.org/10.21039/rsj.372.
Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate?: Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bozkurt, F. (2021). Risâletü'n-Nushiyye’de Bir Üstsöylem Ögesi olarak Kendinden Söz Etme. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23: 226–243.
Chen, S. and Nassaji, H. (2015). Self-mention and identity construction in statement of purpose. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1: 475–480.
Chiluwa, I. (2015). Radicalist discourse: a study of the stances of Nigeria's Boko Haram and Somalia's Al Shabaab on Twitter. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 10 (2): 214–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2015.1041964.
Diani, G. and Freddi, M. (2023). Authorial stance and identity building in weblogs by law scholars and scientists. In R. Plo-Alastrué and I. Corona (eds.) Digital scientific communication: Identity and visibility in research dissemination, 101–124. Cham: Springer.
Dong, J., Du, K. and Buckingham, L. (2024). Author self-reference in cross-linguistic/cultural and cross-disciplinary academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 101352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101352.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2023). Self-mention in L2 (Czech) learner academic discourse: Realisations, functions and distribution across master's theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64: 101272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101272.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2016). Cross-cultural variation in the use of hedges and boosters in academic discourse. Prague Journal of English Studies, 5 (1): 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjes-2016-0009.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. Ed. Martin Luther, Huck Gutman, and Patrick H. Hutton. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
Füssel, H. M. (2007). Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change, 17 (2): 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002.
Galaidin, A. and Bednárová-Gibová, K. (2023). A cross-disciplinary analysis of authorial voice in the rhetorical structures of research article abstracts in the fields of linguistics and economics written by native and non-native English speakers. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 40 (1): 35–60. https://doi.org/10.15290/cr.2023.40.1.02.
Gillings, M. and Dayrell, C. (2023). Climate change in the UK press: examining discourse fluctuation over time. Applied Linguistics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad007.
Grist, N. (2008). Positioning climate change in sustainable development discourse. Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association, 20 (6): 783–803. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1496.
Grothmann, T. and Patt, A. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15 (3): 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002.
Harwood, N. (2005). ‘Nowhere has anyone attempted… In this article I aim to do just that’: A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 37 (8): 1207–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.012.
Hryniuk, K. (2018). Expressing authorial self in research articles written by Polish and English native-speaker writers. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8 (3): 621-642. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.3.5.
Hůlková, I., Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., Jančaříková, R. and Schmied, J. (2019). Intercultural variation in academic discourse: Theme zones and the build-up of coherence in research articles. Topics in Linguistics, 20 (2): 33–53. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2019-0008.
Hutcheon, L. (2003). The politics of postmodernism. London: Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2020). The communication of expertise: changes in academic writing. In M. Gotti, S. Maci, and M. Sala (Eds.), Scholarly Pathways: Knowledge Transfer and Knowledge Exchange in Academia, 33–56. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
Hyland, K. (2015). Genre, discipline and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19: 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005.
Hyland, K. (2008). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies, 8 (2): 1–23.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7 (2): 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365.
Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20 (3): 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0.
Hyland, K. and Jiang, F. K. (2017). Is academic writing becoming more informal? English for Specific Purposes, 45: 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001.
IBM. (2011). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 20.0. New York: IBM.
Isopp, B. (2024). The politics of politicization: Climate change debates in Canadian print media. Public Understanding of Science, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231220226.
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Junnier, F. (2020). Finding voice in biology: A diachronic analysis of self-mention in the discussions of an L2 scholar. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 47: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100889.
Kapranov, O. (2015). Do international corporations speak in one voice on the issue of global climate change: The case of British Petroleum and The Royal Dutch Shell Group. In C. Can, A. Kilimci, and K. Papaja (eds.), Social sciences and humanities: A global perspective, 306–322. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
Kapranov, O. (2020). Self-mention in argumentative essays written by pre-service teachers of English. Beyond Philology. An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching, 17 (2): 97–128. https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2020.2.05.
Kapranov, O. (2021a). Self-mention in academic writing by in-service teachers of English: Exploring Authorial Voices. In M. Burada, O. Tatu, and R. Sinu (eds.) Exploring language variation, diversity and change, 76–100. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kapranov, O. (2021b). Self-mention in science communication associated with COVID-19 research: A comparison of computer-mediated communicative practices in the United Kingdom and the United States of America. American, British and Canadian Studies, 36: 131–153. https://doi.org/10.2478/abcsj-2021-0008.
Kapranov, O. (2021c). Self-mention in research sections of university websites in Estonia and the United Kingdom. BAS British and American Studies, 27: 57–69.
Kapranov, O. (2022). The syntax of climate change: Syntactic means in the construction of Greta Thunberg’s community identity on Facebook. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Philologia, 67 (4): 15–33. https://doi.org/ 10.24193/subbphilo.2022.4.01.
Kapranov, O. (2023a). Throwing soup at Van Gogh: The framing of art in climate change activism by British mass media. Discourses on Culture, 19 (1): 175–200. https://doi.org/10.2478/doc-2023-0008.
Kapranov, O. (2023b). Metonymy in online discourse on Facebook by Greenpeace Australia Pacific. Language: Codification, Competence, Communication, 2 (9): 7–25. https://doi.org/10.24025/2707-0573.9.2024.292828.
Kapranov, O. (2023c). Modal verbs in English-medium research articles on the issue of climate change and health. Acta Marisiensis. Philologia, 5 (5): 38–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/amph-2023-0084.
Kapranov, O. (2023d). Modality in sustainability discourse by Harrods and Liberty: Analysing British cultural icons’ discursive practices. Cultural Perspectives-Journal for Literary and British Cultural Studies in Romania, 28: 85–116.
Karahan, P. (2013). Self-mention in scientific articles written by Turkish and non-Turkish authors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70: 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.068.
Kashiha, H. (2022). On persuasive strategies: Metadiscourse practices in political speeches. Discourse and Interaction, 15 (1): 77–100. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2022-1-77.
Maňáková, M. (2021). Self-mention in the academic discourse of ELF writers. Topics in Linguistics, 22 (2): 32–46. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2021-0009.
Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N. and Brown, B. (2010). Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1 (1): 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.2.
Olmos-Lopez, P., Prudencio, F. E. and Novelo, A. (2022). Mexican economics professors’ publication: Three case studies. English for Specific Purposes, 66: 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.01.002.
O’Neill, S. J., Boykoff, M., Niemeyer, S., and Day, S. A. (2013). On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change, 23 (2): 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.006.
Rotaru, M. C. (2023). Representational choices of the visit of King Charles III to Romania in June 2023 in the speeches of President Klaus Iohannis and King Charles III – A comparative approach. Buletinul Științific al Universității Tehnice de Construcții București Seria: Limbi Străine și Comunicare, 16 (1): 46–62.
Sanz, R. L. (2011). The study of authorial voice: Using a Spanish–English corpus to explore linguistic transference. Corpora, 6 (1): 1–24.
Scheibman, J. (2004). Inclusive and exclusive patterning of the English first person plural: Evidence from conversation. In M. Achard and S. Kemmer (eds). Language, culture and mind, 377–396. Chicago: CSLI Publications.
Trepczyńska, M. (2016). “In this paper I will prove…”: The challenge behind authorial self-representation in L2 undergraduate research paper writing. In H. Chodkiewicz, P. Steinbrich and M. Krzemińska-Adamek (eds.) Working with text and around text in foreign language environments. Second language learning and teaching, 109–123. Cham: Springer.
Vučićević, A. L. and Rakić, A. D. (2023). Self-mention and engagement mechanisms of (negative) evaluation in linguistics academic reviews: A diachronic insight. Зборник радова Филозофског факултета у Приштини, 53 (4): 112–130. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrffp53-44003.
Wang, H. and Hu, Z. (2023). Changes in the ways authors refer to themselves: a diachronic study of self-mention in English research articles. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10 (1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02099-7.
Davies, C. (2021). The royal we: subtle transition as ageing Queen devolves more duties. The Guardian [Online], 29 October. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/oct/29/subtle-transition-as-ageing-queen-devolves-more-duties [Accessed: February 5th, 2024].
Primary Sources
www.royal.uk