Iustinianus Primus Law Review
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr
<p><em><strong>Iustinianus Primus Law Review</strong></em> is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online, scientific law journal published by the Faculty of Law “Iustinianus Primus” at Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia. Its first volume was published in 2010.</p> <p>ISSN 1857-8683</p> <p>Iustinianus Primus Law Review is publish only in electronic format.</p>Ss Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Law Iustinianus Primus, Skopjeen-USIustinianus Primus Law Review1857-8683GENDER PERSPECTIVE ON TAX POLICY
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3521
<p>From ancient times until today, the main function of all tax systems remains<br>unchanged. Their key purpose is to generate revenues, while equity, fairness and<br>non-discrimination are established as fundamental principles of taxation. States use<br>the collected tax revenues to ensure proper functioning of society and to meet<br>essential needs of all citizens. In recent years, the demand for gender equality has<br>emerged as a critical aspect of these needs.<br>Tax systems are generally considered neutral, designed to impact everyone<br>equally. All individuals and citizens are obliged to pay taxes and other public levies,<br>as well to contribute in covering public expenditure regardless of gender, race,<br>colour of skin, national and social origin, political and religious belief, property,<br>and social status. Additionally, the language of the tax provisions does not mention<br>gender in a way that would possibly impose different tax treatment between men<br>and women. Therefore, if taxpayers earn the same income, they will be taxed the<br>same and no one will be questioning gender (in)equity.<br>Traditionally, tax policy is perceived from an economic point of view<br>focusing on revenue generation and economic growth. On the other hand, the<br>gender equality is often seen as a social issue. However, significant disparities exist<br>between men and women in the labor market, including differences in employment<br>status (formal vs. informal), job types, and working hours, as well as distinct<br>consumption patterns influenced by gender roles, particularly in caregiving and<br>household responsibilities. Recognizing these disparities, governments have begun<br>to acknowledge the importance of gender equity and have started to implement<br>measures that are expected to focus on gender biases within tax policies.<br>This paper aims to: (i) explore how tax systems may accidentally perpetuate<br>gender inequalities, and (ii) assess the extent to which states can use the tax policy<br>as an instrument to promote and protect gender equality.</p>Elena Neshovska Kjoseva
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161ETHICAL DILEMMAS AND ACCOUNTABILITY THE CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING DIRECTIVE AS LABOR AND SOCIAL RIGHTS ACCOUNTABILITY TOOL
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3522
<p>Beginning of 2023, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive<br>(CSRD) entered into force, with a purpose to strengthen the rules concerning the<br>social and environmental accountability of large EU and non-EU (if they earn over<br>EUR 150 million on the EU market) companies which will now be expected to<br>report on sustainability. The EU law now requires all large companies and all listed<br>companies (except micro-enterprises) to disclose information on what they see as<br>the risks and opportunities arising from social and environmental issues, and on the<br>impact of their activities on people and the environment. The new Directive will<br>aim to ensure that investors have access to the information they need to assess the<br>impact of companies on people and the environment.<br>In terms of labor and social rights, this is the first European attempt to link<br>social and labor rights standards to the business competitiveness and access to EU<br>funding. As such, it is a very innovative approach, with large potential to rectify all<br>existing discrepancies between formally acknowledged labor and social rights of<br>workers and practical implementation of those rights in business companies.<br>In this paper, we will look into the main research question: whether the<br>Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive has potential to become the first-ever<br>regional labor and social rights accountability tool. In research for this question, we<br>will analyze provisions of the CSRD applicable to assess actual implementation of<br>international fundamental labor and social rights of workers and contractors.<br>Further, we will examine if the Directive has sufficiently elaborated mechanisms to sanction companies which would not align their employment and labor policies to<br>the required standards of the CSRD.</p>Helga Spadina
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161ACQUISITION OF THE GENERAL LEGAL CAPACITY
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3523
<p>The subject of this research paper is the institution of legal capacity, as<br>an element of the main and complex institution of civil law, called<br>"subjectivity". The study shows that the author of this paper aims to present and<br>analyze the acquisition of the general legal capacity that belongs only to natural<br>persons as subjects of civil law relations (real, obligational, and hereditary). In<br>this study, the author presents the acquisition of general legal ability both from<br>the aspect of modern civil law (Macedonian and foreign), as well as from the<br>aspect of modern civil law science (domestic and foreign). Pointing to the<br>different modern norms (as well as the different doctrinal positions) regarding<br>the determination of the time (the moment) of the acquisition of the general<br>legal capacity of natural persons, the author concludes that in legal life they can<br>lead to the adoption of different court rulings, so accordingly, and to the other<br>occurrence of possible real, bond or inheritance rights in favor or to the<br>detriment of the natural person who, by birth, acquires general legal capacity.</p>Shkurte Kadri
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161LOW VOTER TURNOUT: A SYMPTOM OF DEMOCRATIC DISCONTENT OR A DEEPER SYSTEMIC FAILURE?
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3524
<p>The journey toward universal and equal suffrage, achieved primarily in the<br>second half of the XX century, was a monumental step in shaping modern<br>democratic societies. It marked the moment when voting became a right for all, not<br>just a privilege for a few. Yet, as this right became universal in democratic societies,<br>an unexpected trend began to unfold. Democracies worldwide have started to<br>experience a troubling and persistent decline in voter turnout. Global electoral<br>participation, which stood at 78.85% in 1946, has now diminished to 61.37%. The<br>situation is even more alarming in Europe, where turnout has dropped from 88% in<br>1946 to an average of 61% in 2024. This trend is deeply concerning, taking into<br>consideration that democracy cannot function properly without citizens’<br>involvement. Without a doubt, low turnout poses a danger to democracy as it<br>undermines legitimacy of the political institutions, diminishes the<br>representativeness and accountability of political leaders and reflects growing civic<br>apathy and dissatisfaction with the political process. Furthermore, since political<br>systems often respond more to those who vote, low turnout allows certain groups<br>to wield disproportionate influence over elections and policy, often at the expense<br>of the broader public interest. Such a state is also a signal of inequality in political<br>participation, further marginalizing already disadvantaged groups. Therefore, this<br>paper seeks to examine the underlying causes of declining voter turnout, as well as<br>propose strategies and measures to increase voter turnout in democratic societies.</p>Marko Krtolica
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161INTEGRATING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS INTO MODEL BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATIES
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3525
<p>In today’s globalized economy, foreign direct investment (FDI) is a key component of<br>national development strategies. The proliferation of multinational enterprises has led to an<br>increase in foreign-controlled or influenced trading firms, often causing FDI to be<br>overshadowed by portfolio investments. Nevertheless, FDIs contribute far more than financial<br>resources, they often introduce cutting-edge technology, advanced management skills,<br>innovation, and integration into international markets, which together drive more inclusive and<br>sustainable economic growth in the host country. Three primary factors determine a country’s<br>attractiveness to foreign investors. First, favorable macroeconomic conditions, such as robust<br>economic performance naturally draw investor interest. Second, a stable political landscape<br>reassures investors, encouraging long-term commitments. Third, legal predictability and a<br>transparent regulatory framework are critical to building investor trust and ensuring<br>consistency. In this regard, FDI becomes a fundamental engine of progress, delivering not just<br>capital, but also vital knowledge, infrastructure, and employment opportunities. Techlogy<br>transfer, within this setting, involves the sharing or adoption of scientific knowledge and<br>production methods across organizations, sectors, or nations. This transfer occurs through<br>channels such as foreign investments, international trade, patent agreements, technical training,<br>and advisory services. This paper examines the role of sustainable development as facilitated<br>by the latest generation of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs), and their potential to advance<br>sustainable development in an increasingly interconnected global market. These modern BITs<br>are crafted to encourage FDI from capital-abundant, high-tech economies, often OECD<br>countries, into developing regions. By offering legal guarantees and reducing investment risks,<br>these treaties aim to stimulate the movement of funds, technologies, and know-how from<br>advanced economies to those still on the path of development.</p>Toni DeskovskiVangel Dokovski
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161GENDER EQUALITY AND NON-DISCRIMINATION AT WORK THROUGH THE LENS OF INTERNATIONAL LABOUR STANDARDS
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3526
<p>International Labour Organization (ILO) adopted the Discrimination<br>(Employment and Occupation) Convention (No. 111) and Recommendation<br>(No. 111), 1958, as the first comprehensive instruments dealing specifically<br>with equality and non-discrimination in respect of employment and occupation.<br>Convention No. 111 places the general principle of equality and nondiscrimination<br>in the context of the world of work. However, other ILO<br>standards expressly prohibiting discriminatory measures have been adopted.<br>Considering that elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and<br>occupation is one of the fundamental principles and rights at work, the<br>international labour standards are of crucial importance in ensuring equality of<br>opportunity and treatment, including gender equality. Gender equality at work<br>relates to all men and women. It cannot be achieved without the elimination of<br>discrimination. One of the main reasons is that gender inequality is often rooted<br>in discrimination. Discrimination in employment and occupation is a universal<br>and permanently evolving phenomenon. It can take a variety of forms, such as<br>direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, discrimination-based harassment,<br>multiple discrimination, intersectional discrimination and specific forms of<br>discrimination, which will be discussed in the paper. In relation to gender<br>equality, discrimination can be based on many discriminatory grounds, which<br>are mainly linked to sex as discriminatory ground. According to ILO Committee<br>of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations (CEACR),<br>the notion of “sex” as a prohibited discriminatory ground has evolved to include<br>pregnancy and maternity, civil and marital status, and family situation and<br>responsibilities, as well as sexual harassment as a serious manifestation of sex<br>discrimination. Therefore, discrimination based on the aforementioned grounds,<br>including sexual harassment, will be examined. In 2019, ILO adopted the<br>Violence and Harassment Convention (No. 190). It is the first international<br>labour standard to address violence and harassment in the world of work,<br>including gender-based harassment, which will also be analyzed.</p>Angjela Jovanovska
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161THE PRE-EMPTION RIGHT ON REAL ESTATE DURING PUBLIC SALES IN THE MACEDONIAN AND SERBIAN LEGAL SYSTEMS
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3527
<p>In this paper, the authors examine the right of pre-emption established on<br>real estate (land parcels, building units, and other types of real estate). The authors<br>analyze both contractual and legal rights of pre-emption since they lead to different<br>legal consequences. When analyzing the right of pre-emption, the authors focus on<br>the exercise of these rights in enforcement proceedings, highlighting the problems<br>that individuals face when exercising their rights during these proceedings. The<br>given analysis of the pre-emption right in this paper is a comparative one and<br>includes the Macedonian and Serbian legal systems. By giving a comparative<br>analysis of the exercise of the right of pre-emption in enforcement proceedings, the<br>authors aim to underline the problems and offer legal solutions on how such issues<br>can be resolved in the Macedonian and Serbian legal systems. The authors call for<br>the adoption of a more efficient and contemporary regulation on the issue from<br>which both legal systems can benefit.</p>Gordana StankovicRodna Zivkovska
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161INTEGRATION WITH THE EU BRIS - CHALLENGES FOR THE CENTRAL REGISTRY OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3528
<p>The Business Registers Interconnection System (BRIS) is the mandatory<br>interconnection of all EU Member States’ business registers. The national business<br>register, among other things, contains official information on companies, such as<br>the legal form of the company, its registered office, capital, ownership structure,<br>financial reports, changes in corporate status information, and makes this<br>information available to the public. The concept of integrating national business<br>registers into a unified system is intended to enhance corporate transparency and<br>foster cross-border cooperation. However, the diversity of existing national<br>registers poses numerous challenges, from legislative discrepancies to<br>technological incompatibilities. This paper aims to demonstrate the necessity of<br>preparing for the integration of the Central (Business) Registry of North Macedonia<br>with BRIS, especially considering the continuous emphasis on this requirement in<br>the European Commission Country Reports. Given that there will certainly be<br>potential challenges in the process, it is crucial to approach adaptation and move as<br>close as possible to established standards.</p>Biljana PetrevskaKaterina Zateva
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161PERFORMANCE-RELATED PAY AND PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN CROATIAN CIVIL SERVICE: LEGAL REGULATION AND POSSIBLE OUTCOMES
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3529
<p>In 2024, important changes to the legal regulation of human potential<br>management in Croatian civil service occurred. Specifically, the new Civil Servants<br>Act was enacted, replacing the previous Act in force for almost 20 years. Parallelly,<br>the new Law on Salaries in the Civil Service and Public Services was enacted,<br>introducing performance-related pay in Croatian civil and public service. The paper<br>aims to analyse the new regulations regulating civil service, including the bylaws,<br>and discuss possible outcomes. Methodologically, the paper relies on the legal<br>analysis of the existing regulations, but empirical data from the survey conducted<br>in December 2023 among civil servants are also presented. These data show that<br>civil servants in Croatia want the introduction of PRP, but challenges such as the<br>limitation to the number of civil servants receiving the highest performance<br>appraisal grades, the lack of training on the new performance appraisal system and<br>the lack of the developmental usage of performance appraisal, can jeopardise the<br>outcomes of the reform.</p>Romea Manojlovic Toman
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161CONFLICTING CONNECTIVITIES: LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR NEGOTIATING GEOTECHNOLOGICAL RIVALRY
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3530
<p>Among the dramatic global shifts of recent years, the sharpening of<br>geopolitical rivalries between major powers – chiefly the United States and<br>China – has particular significance for third countries and their legal systems.<br>This rivalry has a prominent ‘geotechnological’ dimension, as major powers<br>compete to build power through technological innovation, standardisation and<br>diffusion while also securitising their domestic technology sectors against<br>perceived threats from abroad. In this context, the ‘connectivity’ initiatives of<br>major powers such as China, the United States and the European Union - which<br>aim to build economic and other links with third countries - compete and even<br>conflict. Under the pressures of trade war and actual war, an emergent global<br>shift may be underway in the consolidation of rival geotechnological blocs.<br>Indications of such a shift include hard legal tools such as trade barriers and the<br>legislation of economic security mechanisms but also the creation of incentives<br>for economic and technological collaboration within informal clubs of likeminded<br>countries. These hard and soft tools amount to building blocks for<br>‘walled garden’ connectivity projects that run on incompatible operating<br>systems. These developments create challenges for third countries and<br>especially for the majority of states which rely on transnational investment and<br>technology transfer for the further development of their economies and living<br>standards. Even if not forced to ‘choose’ between competing blocs, these states<br>face additional political, legal and economic frictions in their dealings with<br>major powers. The challenge is particularly acute for the states of the Western<br>Balkans, which remain outside the EU despite years or decades of ‘candidate’<br>status but which face the necessity of alignment with EU laws and policies as<br>conditions of eventual EU membership. To varying degrees, the Western Balkan<br>states have sourced investment and technology transfer from the EU and the<br>United States as well as from China and other non-Western countries. They are<br>therefore on the frontline of conflicting connectivities and vulnerable to a<br>hardening of barriers between major economic powers. This paper will provide an overview of legal tools of geotechnological<br>rivalry and their application to the general-purpose digital technologies that are vital to economic development and the climate transition. It will take stock of<br>the challenges for third countries presented by the deployment of these tools in<br>the context of competing ‘connectivity’ projects promoted by major economic<br>powers, such as China’s Belt and Road initiative. It will focus on the position<br>of Western Balkan states as EU candidate countries that simultaneously pursue<br>economic relations with other major powers. The paper will reflect on what<br>studies of legal pluralism suggest regarding the capacity of third states to<br>preserve space for maintaining relations with the multiple poles of the global<br>economy. It will suggest potential legal strategies for third states to navigate<br>conflicting connectivities in order to pursue their national developmental<br>objectives. The paper will suggest that by negotiating rather than participating<br>in geotechnological rivalry, third states can both preserve their capacity to make<br>autonomous choices and mitigate against the coalescing of rival blocs.</p>Stephen Minas
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161GENDER, GENDER IDENTITY, AND THE CHALLENGE OF INTEGRATING THEM INTO CROATIAN LEGISLATION
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3531
<p>Over the last several decades, there has been a significant development in<br>feminist legal theory, particularly regarding the distinction between concepts of<br>"gender" and "sex" and the understanding of gender equality. This development has<br>influenced the International, European and domestic law. Despite Croatia’s<br>accession to the European Union in 2013—a sui generis organisation recognised<br>for its leadership in promoting gender equality—the country has yet to adopt a clear<br>position on applying "gender" and "gender identity" in its legislation. The<br>Constitution of the Republic of Croatia, established in 1990, exclusively uses the<br>term "sex." It affirms that sex equality is among the highest values of the<br>constitutional order and guarantees protection against discrimination based on<br>"sex." Most Croatian laws also continue to reference "sex." In recent years,<br>however, there has been a gradual incorporation of the terms "gender" and "gender<br>identity" into the Croatian legislation. Notably, the Constitutional Court of the<br>Republic of Croatia expressly stated in its case law that the Constitution protects<br>sexual and gender diversity. This paper will address the main challenges associated<br>with integrating concepts of gender and gender identity into the Croatian legal<br>framework.</p>Anita BlagojevicIvana Tucak
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161ETHICAL, LEGAL, AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF EUTHANASIA AND ASSISTED SUICIDE
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3532
<p>This paper provides an overview of the definition of the term euthanasia, its<br>forms, historical development and legal nature. In recent years, the issue of<br>euthanasia and its legalization has often become the subject of stimulating<br>discussions. Within those discussions, supporters and opponents of the early<br>termination of life appear, but there is no unified opinion on this topic. The reasons<br>why nowadays the question of ceasing a human life is opened are evident.<br>The great scientific achievements in the field of modern medicine, which<br>make possible on one hand to protect and extend human life, and on the other hand,<br>the great respect of society for the autonomy of the individual and the distancing of<br>the traditional spiritual values. The issue of legalizing euthanasia goes through the<br>historical stages of religion, ethics, medicine, law, but also the general cultural<br>context while being examined through the prism of the individual view of each of<br>us, depending not only on our stage of life.<br>Modern times are faced with homosexuality, surgical sex change, promotion<br>of same-sex marriages and at the same time appeal for the acceptance of diversity,<br>not as a difference but as a divergent given of the phenomena in the world around<br>us as human values. This means that the stereotype of human values within the legal<br>framework is broken in relation to the ethical, social, legal, religious pragma of the<br>world, in that case why should euthanasia be a stigmatization of doctors if it is the<br>autonomous will of the sick or his relatives - in the instance of lacking<br>consciousness to decide for themselves - or when there is no possibility of cure.<br>States have different legislation in their legal system regarding the making<br>of this decision. Euthanasia is legalized in the legal legislation of some European<br>countries (Netherlands, Switzerland, Luxembourg and Belgium). Other countries<br>have pronounced sanctions for the perpetrators in their legal system (North<br>Macedonia, Croatia, Czech Republic). Others go to the opposite extreme, where<br>they have legalized the euthanasia of terminally ill children (Netherlands,<br>Belgium). On top of this different way of regulating legal systems in countries<br>around the world, there are countless circumstances that have an impact when<br>making the decision whether this act will be sanctioned. Especially from a<br>scientific, cultural and religious aspect. Today, the number of countries that legalize<br>passive euthanasia is gradually increasing, choosing a way and opportunity to help<br>the sick to reduce their suffering in a dignified way, but the number of countries<br>where it is sanctioned is still greater. A unified ethically accepted solution does not<br>yet exist, so in view of that, the matter of deciding to end the life of an incurably ill<br>person remains as a verdict for the legislative bodies in each country separately. From this research, I came to the knowledge that seriously ill people<br>suffering from an incurable disease and their loved ones are not prevented from<br>shortening their suffering in a dignified way in a country where euthanasia is<br>legalized.<br>In this paper, relevant court judgments from the practice of the European<br>Court of Human Rights of certain countries (Switzerland and France) will be<br>presented.</p>Irena Josifova
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161THE EUROPEAN UNION'S COPYRIGHT POLICY IN THE DIGITAL AGE: AN ANALYSIS OF NEW MEDIA AND THE DIRECTIVE ON COPYRIGHT IN THE DIGITAL SINGLE MARKET
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3533
<p>The media play a pivotal role in fostering connections among individuals and<br>facilitating interaction within communities and society at large. They serve as platforms<br>for sharing collective experiences and, through communication processes, contribute to the<br>creation of a sense of belonging to a unified societal structure. The advent of the internet,<br>coupled with the rapid technological revolution, has significantly transformed the media<br>landscape, leading to the emergence and proliferation of new media. These new media<br>encompass digital technologies that enable interactive and networked communication,<br>marking a departure from the one-way communication model characteristic of traditional<br>media such as television, radio, and print. The platforms associated with new media<br>include, but are not limited to, social media, blogs, podcasts, online video sharing<br>platforms, virtual reality environments, and mobile applications.<br>The rise of new media has, however, created a need for substantial adjustments to<br>the existing legal frameworks, particularly concerning copyright regulations. At the<br>European Union level, this shift has been addressed through reforms aimed at balancing<br>the rights of content creators with the evolving demands and expectations of consumers in<br>the digital age. One of the most significant legislative responses to this challenge is the<br>Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, adopted in 2019. This directive<br>represents a comprehensive effort to update copyright regulations in light of the new media<br>environment, ensuring both the protection of intellectual property and fair access for<br>consumers.<br>This paper explores the European Union's approach to copyright policy, with an<br>emphasis on the key legislative instruments and reforms introduced to regulate new media.<br>Special attention is given to the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market,<br>analyzing its implications for content creation and dissemination in the digital realm.<br>Furthermore, the paper examines the potential impact of the directive on freedom of<br>expression, particularly through its new rules on content regulation, and evaluates the<br>position of the European Court of Justice on this issue.</p>Martina Todorova
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161IMPACT OF GLOBAL CONFLICTS AND POWER DYNAMICS ON TRADE AND COMMODITIES
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3534
<p>The paper "Impact of Global Conflicts and Power Dynamics on Trade and<br>Commodities" examines the transformative effects of geopolitical tensions and<br>global power shifts on international trade and commodity flows. It argues that longstanding<br>supply chain models and traditional management practices are being<br>upended by rapidly evolving global conditions — including conflicts such as the<br>war in Ukraine and regional instabilities— - that are disrupting established trade<br>routes and forcing industry to seek alternative sources of raw materials. The authors<br>examine the evolution from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0, emphasizing the<br>integration of digitalization, intelligent automation and improved human–machine<br>collaboration to create more resilient and flexible production systems. The study<br>highlights that the depletion of domestic resources in developed countries,<br>combined with increasing reliance on distant supply chains, has increased<br>vulnerability to geopolitical and economic shocks. In response, companies are<br>urged to adopt flexible, digitally integrated management systems that enable realtime<br>monitoring and adaptive decision-making. The paper proposes strategic<br>measures such as the use of advanced logistics information systems, intelligent<br>robotics, sustainable and circular economy practices, and modular organizational<br>structures that can be reconfigured to mitigate risk. It also emphasizes the<br>importance of investing in human capital and promoting global connectivity to<br>ensure continuous and efficient flows of goods in the face of ongoing international<br>challenges.</p>Patricija JankovicSaso MurticDomagoj Rozac
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161COMPLIANCE – COMPANY LAW AND CRIMINAL LAW PERSPECTIVES
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3535
<p>Compliance is an important topic from both company law and criminal law<br>perspectives. However, it is generally not sufficiently discussed in Serbian legal<br>literature. This is true to an even greater extent regarding the intersection between<br>company law and criminal law. It this paper, the authors provide an overview of the<br>rules referencing compliance function in Serbian laws which govern companies and<br>their organization, as well as in codes applicable to both the public and private<br>sectors. Because new laws are often adopted or the laws in force are amended in<br>Serbia, it is not easy to interpret and comply with laws. Serbian legal system<br>recognizes liability of legal persons for criminal offences, but the Law of Liability<br>of Legal Persons for Criminal Offences is rarely applied in practice. On the other<br>hand, liability for economic offences is much more common. Therefore,<br>compliance system is also a crime prevention measure that could lead to reduction<br>of costs for companies, but specific conditions as, for example, law application,<br>must be taken into account in order to understand the compliance system effects on<br>company behaviour. After outlining the relevant rules, the authors present the<br>findings of their research which was carried out by analysing the codes of ethics<br>and corporate governance codes of several Serbian companies and their approaches<br>to compliance. Specifically, the authors examined the compliance programs of the<br>40 most successful companies in Serbia in 2023. The authors conclude that more<br>than half of the companies in the sample acknowledge and publish some elements<br>of their compliance programs on their websites. The most common elements are<br>the whistle-blowing procedure and the code of ethics. Compared to other research<br>conducted abroad, it can be concluded that while companies in Serbia recognize the<br>importance of compliance, there is still room for improvement in terms of the<br>number of companies that publicly share their compliance efforts, as well as the<br>content and quality of these reports.</p>Jelena LepeticNatalija Lukic
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161LEGAL ASPECTS OF INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS IN THE TRANSPORT SECTOR
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3536
<p>Transport has a significant harmful impact on the environment, contributing<br>to air, water and soil pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and climate change.<br>Burning fossil fuels in transportation means releases large amounts of CO₂ and<br>other pollutants, degrading air quality and contributing to global warming.<br>Transport also causes noise pollution and habitat destruction due to infrastructure<br>development like roads and highways. On the other hand, sustainable transport<br>seeks to minimise these negative effects by promoting cleaner technologies, such<br>as electric and hydrogen-powered vehicles, and improving fuel efficiency.<br>Industrial symbiosis in the transport sector refers to collaborative efforts between<br>companies to optimise resources, reduce waste, and improve energy efficiency.<br>Industrial symbiosis in the transport sector can include recycling vehicles and their<br>parts, using alternative fuels, sharing infrastructure, etc. There are several<br>successful practical examples of industrial symbiosis in the transport sector. While<br>no single legal framework is dedicated solely to industrial symbiosis in transport,<br>the legal aspects of this concept are covered through broader regulations related to<br>sustainability, the circular economy, and emissions reduction. These legal<br>frameworks include European Union directives and Member States' national laws<br>as well as international treaties and rules of most important international<br>organisations dealing with transport. At the European Union level, the European<br>Green Deal is a key policy initiative to achieve climate neutrality by 2050. It<br>encourages emissions reduction in the transport sector by promoting energy<br>efficiency, vehicle electrification, and circular economy principles - key<br>components of industrial symbiosis. Within the Green Deal, the Circular Economy<br>Action Plan promotes recycling, waste reduction, and the sharing of resources<br>across industries, which is fundamental to industrial symbiosis. Industrial<br>symbiosis also includes legal aspects related to waste management (Waste<br>Framework Directive), alternative fuels and energy regulations (Directive (EU)<br>2018/2001 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources,<br>Regulation (EU) 2019/631 setting CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles), legislation on the use of<br>shared infrastructure, etc. However, inadequate legislation (regulation) is very often<br>mentioned as a type of industrial symbiosis barrier.<br>The paper lists various issues and regulations that regulate sustainability in<br>transport. The paper presents the most important provisions of European<br>regulations aimed at reducing environmental pollution, especially those related to<br>transport and those that mention industrial symbiosis as a form of environmentally<br>friendly production and activity.</p>Biljana Cincurak Erceg
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161CONTEMPORARY TENDENCIES IN THE REPRESENTATION OF NATURAL PERSONS IN CIVIL LAW
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3537
<p>One of the most important institutes of civil law, without which modern civil law relations<br>cannot be imagined, is the institute of representation. It enables the exercise of the civil law rights<br>of natural persons in circumstances when they cannot exercise their rights personally. The<br>representation makes it possible for natural persons to participate in civil law relations, even when<br>they lack the active legal capacity to acquire rights and duties. However, representation is not only<br>an instrument that enables natural persons lacking active legal capacity to participate in civil law<br>relations but also an institute that creates opportunities for natural persons with active legal<br>capacity to undertake legal actions via a representative. Considering the scope and relevance of<br>representation in civil law, this paper aims to examine and analyze the contemporary tendencies<br>of development of this institute in civil law. The paper will demonstrate that this traditional civil<br>law institute has been involved in the legal systems of contemporary European countries over time.<br>The end goal is to evaluate how the Macedonian legal system aligns with these contemporary<br>tendencies regarding the regulation of representation in Macedonian civil law.</p>Tea Lalevska
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161THE LEGAL NATURE OF THE RIGHT TO A LONGTERM LEASE
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3538
<p>The right to a long-term lease was introduced in the Macedonian property<br>law system for the first time by a subject-specific law - the Construction Land Act<br>of 2001. Since then, the right to a long-term lease has remained a part of every<br>Construction Land Act that followed up to the most recent one - the Construction<br>Land Act of 2015. The regulation of the right to a long-term lease in the<br>Construction Land Act is mostly based on the regulation of the so-called right to<br>build found in the Slovenian Property Code and the Croatian Ownership and Other<br>Real Rights Act. In the respective legal systems, the so-called right to build is<br>undoubtedly regulated as a right in rem since it is found in property and ownership<br>acts. However, In the Macedonian legal system, the right to a long-term lease was<br>not incorporated in the Ownership and Other Real Rights Act of 2001. This raised<br>the question of whether or not it could be considered a right in rem. By exploring<br>the origins, the regulation pertaining to the right to a long-term lease, its<br>characteristics, and the reasons for its incorporation in the Macedonian property<br>law system, this paper aims to demonstrate that the right to a long-term lease is by<br>nature a right in rem.</p>Tina Przheska
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS IN SPATIAL PLANNING AND BUILDING
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3539
<p>The principle of the legality of administration is valid today in its strict or<br>narrow form. Therefore, the administrative bodies are obliged to act in a way<br>determined by the law and by-laws. When it comes to the point when certain change<br>in legislation is necessary, such as situations when an old regulation (spatial plan)<br>is put out of force, one should bear in mind that there is a possibility that new<br>legislation is less favourable for some citizens. In other words, it can be said that<br>the affected party, as a consequence, may suffer certain damage.<br>Due to such situations, the principle of legitimate expectations has<br>developed and is widely recognized in the European countries. The principle of<br>legitimate expectations is often linked to the principle of legal certainty. Both<br>principles, and the principle of acquired rights of the parties are recognized in the<br>practice of the Court of the European Union, the practice of the European Court of<br>Human Rights, and the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of<br>Croatia. Hence, in situations of amending legislation, local governments should<br>take into the account the protection of legitimate expectations based on valid<br>regulations.<br>The aim of the paper is to research possible basis for the principle of<br>legitimate expectations in spatial planning and building. The second aim of the<br>paper is to research if there is a possibility for compensation if a lawful general act<br>(spatial plan) is revoked or repealed. The aim of the paper is also to detect European<br>countries which apply planning compensation</p>Mateja Held
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161LEGAL OR PROCEDURAL “GAME” BETWEEN THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EU (CJEU) AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (ECTHR) IN THE PROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS?
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3541
<p>In its practice so far, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has two key<br>sources of inspiration regarding the protection of fundamental rights: the first<br>source is the constitutional traditions of the EU Member States, while the second<br>one is the international agreements that protect human rights and freedoms, signed<br>by the Member States of the Union. Although it is a question of two intertwined<br>and interdependent sources, the CJEU still very often considers them separately on<br>a case-by-case basis. In the legal argumentation, it is a fact that the EU Member<br>States remain obliged to respect not only EU law, but also the UN human rights<br>conventions, to take care of the application of the law of the Council of Europe, and<br>in certain cases, the international customary law. There are strong arguments in<br>support of this position in EU law as well. Therefore, the position of the EU is<br>represented as a key factor in the respect of human rights and freedoms that directly<br>derive from the UN Charter and from other UN conventions for the protection of<br>human rights. In order to protect human rights from parallel multifacetedness that<br>can lead to negative implications, the EU institutions, predominantly through the<br>CJEU, cooperate with the competent institutions of the Council of Europe and the<br>UN and, on a formal or informal level, accept the already established standards in<br>the promotion and protection of human rights. In the paper, the emphasis of the<br>analysis will be on explaining the phenomenology of this legal and/or procedural<br>game that takes place at the institutional level with special reference to the principle<br>of primacy and legitimacy. The basic hypothesis of the paper is that Europe has<br>complex system of fundamental rights protection. It is a truly “crowded house”. Citizens and legal practitioners are confronted with different binding texts to be<br>applied sometimes simultaneously, using different standards, structures,<br>terminology and qualifications. These are domestic law, including in most cases the<br>national constitution’s fundamental rights, the European Convention on Human<br>Rights and its protocols as well as EU law, in particular the EU Charter of<br>Fundamental Rights. On the other hand, the EU Charter for fundamental rights and<br>the general principles of Union law are the primary fundamental rights instruments<br>when assessing EU law and national measures within the scope of application of<br>EU law. In practice, there is an active dialogue and a high degree of consensus<br>among European and highest national constitutional and supreme courts on<br>protection of human rights.</p>Savo KlimovskiTanja Karakamisheva - Jovanovska
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161SEVERAL LEGAL PRESUMPTIONS AS THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL STABILITY IN MODERN FEDERALISM
https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/iplr/article/view/3542
<p>This paper explores the legal foundations necessary for ensuring<br>constitutional stability in modern federal systems. Federalism, as a system of<br>governance, requires a well-defined distribution of powers between central and<br>subnational governments, supported by a clear legal hierarchy and mechanisms to<br>resolve jurisdictional conflicts. The coexistence of two parallel legal orders,<br>necessitates structured mechanisms to maintain legal coherence, prevent conflicts,<br>and uphold constitutional supremacy. The study examines key principles that<br>contribute to federal stability, including the supremacy of the constitution, the<br>hierarchy of legal acts, and judicial review as a mechanism for resolving legal<br>disputes. It analyzes two primary approaches for addressing conflicts between<br>federal and state laws: the primacy of federal law and judicial review as an<br>enforcement mechanism. Additionally, the paper highlights the role of<br>constitutional courts in adjudicating disputes over legislative and executive<br>competences, emphasizing their function in preserving the federal balance. Further,<br>the paper explores the right of federal entities to initiate review of constitutionality<br>of federal laws, comparing systems where this right is explicitly granted, with those<br>where it is restricted. Finally, it addresses jurisdictional conflicts both among<br>federal entities and between federal and subnational governments, demonstrating<br>how constitutional courts serve as arbiters in resolving such disputes. Ultimately,<br>the paper argues that federal systems require a combination of legal hierarchy,<br>judicial enforcement, and institutional checks and balances to function effectively.<br>By ensuring compliance with constitutional norms, preventing excessive<br>centralization or fragmentation, and maintaining a structured conflict-resolution<br>framework, these mechanisms contribute to the long-term stability and coherence<br>of federal governance.</p>Jelena Trajkovska Hristovska
Copyright (c)
2025-05-262025-05-26161