LEGAL OR PROCEDURAL “GAME” BETWEEN THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EU (CJEU) AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (ECTHR) IN THE PROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS?

Authors

  • Savo Klimovski ,
  • Tanja Karakamisheva - Jovanovska ,

Keywords:

human rights, protection, CJEU, ECtHR, Charter, UN, Council of Europe, constitution

Abstract

In its practice so far, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has two key
sources of inspiration regarding the protection of fundamental rights: the first
source is the constitutional traditions of the EU Member States, while the second
one is the international agreements that protect human rights and freedoms, signed
by the Member States of the Union. Although it is a question of two intertwined
and interdependent sources, the CJEU still very often considers them separately on
a case-by-case basis. In the legal argumentation, it is a fact that the EU Member
States remain obliged to respect not only EU law, but also the UN human rights
conventions, to take care of the application of the law of the Council of Europe, and
in certain cases, the international customary law. There are strong arguments in
support of this position in EU law as well. Therefore, the position of the EU is
represented as a key factor in the respect of human rights and freedoms that directly
derive from the UN Charter and from other UN conventions for the protection of
human rights. In order to protect human rights from parallel multifacetedness that
can lead to negative implications, the EU institutions, predominantly through the
CJEU, cooperate with the competent institutions of the Council of Europe and the
UN and, on a formal or informal level, accept the already established standards in
the promotion and protection of human rights. In the paper, the emphasis of the
analysis will be on explaining the phenomenology of this legal and/or procedural
game that takes place at the institutional level with special reference to the principle
of primacy and legitimacy. The basic hypothesis of the paper is that Europe has
complex system of fundamental rights protection. It is a truly “crowded house”. Citizens and legal practitioners are confronted with different binding texts to be
applied sometimes simultaneously, using different standards, structures,
terminology and qualifications. These are domestic law, including in most cases the
national constitution’s fundamental rights, the European Convention on Human
Rights and its protocols as well as EU law, in particular the EU Charter of
Fundamental Rights. On the other hand, the EU Charter for fundamental rights and
the general principles of Union law are the primary fundamental rights instruments
when assessing EU law and national measures within the scope of application of
EU law. In practice, there is an active dialogue and a high degree of consensus
among European and highest national constitutional and supreme courts on
protection of human rights.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-26